Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Brooklyn - Toronto ?!?!?!

  1. #1
    Raptors Republic All-Star e2thed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,425
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Brooklyn - Toronto ?!?!?!




    Bargs is gone, we give up Ross though. IMO we have to throw something in to sweeten any kind of trade with Bargs.

    We get players who are on the bench, solid players none the less. Brooks can shoot the three more constantly than Ross at this point of his career, but Ross will end up with the better career at the end of the day.

    Just a thought....

  2. #2
    Raptors Republic Veteran white men can't jump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,659
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    This deal is very one-sided.

    Humphries is a worse player and contract than Bargs.

    I'd also wager that Ross turns out better than Brooks.

  3. #3
    Raptors Republic Superstar isaacthompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Oakville
    Posts
    3,554
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Brooks has been nailed to the bench in Brooklyn, but in the minutes that he's gotten, he's proved he belongs in the league. Wasn't all-Rookie first team for nothing last year. I don't know who to pick, between Ross and Brooks, at this point.
    Twitter - @thekid_it

  4. #4
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    243
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote white men can't jump wrote: View Post
    This deal is very one-sided.

    Humphries is a worse player and contract than Bargs.

    I'd also wager that Ross turns out better than Brooks.
    I wouldn't say Humphries is a worse player than Bargnani. Humphries is a top notch rebounder on both sides who scores a lot of his points off assists and putbacks. His on/off court numbers were far superior to Bargnani's (+6.6 offensively, -1 defensively), whereas Bargnani's +/- offensively fluctates from year to year and his +/- defensively is always bad (in the positives). Can't really put stock in a one year +/- number, but not once has the team played better defence with Bargnani on the court.

    Humphries is certainly not a worse contract; he does make $2 million more a season, but his contract is a year shorter than Bargnani's.

    I don't know if I'd give up on Ross so quick because while I like Brooks, I think Ross' ceiling is higher.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •