Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 61 to 62 of 62

Thread: Alternatives to tanking. Please be civil

  1. #61
    Raptors Republic Starter Shrub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    378
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    There is no single, isolated alternative to tanking, just as tanking is not an isolated solution to losing.

    There are just a shitload of other things that can happen in different combinations that make tanking unnecessary.

    The two key things are:

    1.) Changes in chemistry.
    We have no idea what the relationships between players are, and how that affects the play we see on the court. Basketball is an extremely team-oriented game, and players have to be on the same page. The acquisition or departure of one single body can change everything. A shift in the mentality of one single body can change everything. Everything. And this includes the coaching staff, and anybody influencing the athletes.

    2.) Internal development.
    Never forget that this is just a whole bunch of people doing something. People are fickle. Remember when Salmons was a revelation on Milwaukee? I do. Wasn't though, was he? Remember when MCW looked like he had never seen a basketball before in summer league? Remember when the absence of Kendrick Perkins was the reason Boston lost to LA in the finals?
    Remember when Vince Carter was just a freak athlete who didn't age well (some people still believe this)? Remember when Stephen Curry was too small? Remember how hopeless Boston and Phoenix were this year?

    Point is:
    Nobody should be dead-set on tanking.
    Too many variables.
    You make up your mind on anything, ever, and stop taking in new information, you're a sucker.

  2. Like MixxAOR liked this post
  3. #62
    Raptors Republic Hall of Famer mcHAPPY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    17,776
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    There is a lot of confusion about tanking. It does not mean that a coach tries to lose and that the players try to lose. It means that all personnel decisions are made with an eye to the future, and nothing is done to enhance the immediate prospects of the team. Good veterans who will not be around in two or three or four years have no role to play so they get traded or benched. A team plays young and inexperienced guys who will likely lose, even trying as hard as they can to win. But if the team does ever contend, these are the players who will be on that team. The coach will work hard to install his system and teach the players to play properly; he is not trying to allow bad habits to form. This was how the Celtics tanked in 2007, after Pierce went down with his injury. As one who watched nearly every Celtics game that year, I can state that it was an entertaining team.

    http://www1.realgm.com/article/23109...ssible-Mission
    Tanking does not have to be a dirty word
    "Championships are what we live for, now lets go win them."
    Tim Leiweke

    Basketball has clear winners every night --
    except at the draft, which is all homework, politics and chance.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •