Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ideal Roster For Next Season? Vince Carter Involved?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This is a shitty conversation... sorry fellas but there is no way Dion Waiters should be able to illicit such long paragraphs. The guy is a legit scrub.
    The Baltic Beast is unstoppable!

    Comment


    • I just think that Waiters ability to handle and score as a sixth man is a very valuable skill to a team concept. I like one primary scorer off the bench, rather than having all the scoring punch in our starting unit, because it balances the team so your bench can hold or even extend leads. The lack of bench was really evident when Pattman went down and we needed to lean heavily on Vasquez. I would sacrifice some scoring from our starting unit for more defense, and have a stronger 3 man rotation off the bench.

      I would also look at Jordan Crawford in the offseason to fill this role. Or Carlos Delfino (less scoring, but more D) in a Bucks trade. PJ3 is a defensive specialist.

      For example. A lineup of:

      Lowry/De Colo
      Ross/[Delfino]
      Giannis/[PJ3]
      Amir/Pattman
      Val

      is a very strong starting and bench unit. Every position is able to defend (except Crawford). Scoring from the starting unit is very balanced, makes us harder to defend. Depending on the development from the young guys that team has the potential to be a consistent top 4 team in the East for many years.

      Similar thing with Waiters, except less D and a big question mark at SF...both things I covered in my original post.

      Lowry/De Colo
      Ross/Waiters
      [PJ3]
      Amir/Pattman
      Val
      Last edited by OldSkoolCool; Mon Apr 14, 2014, 11:32 AM.

      Comment


      • enlightenment wrote: View Post
        This is a shitty conversation... sorry fellas but there is no way Dion Waiters should be able to illicit such long paragraphs. The guy is a legit scrub.
        Ditto. I've seen stretches where he's gone like 3-15 every other night and then lit it up occasionally, he's up and down like a yo yo. At least DD is steadily consistent with his numbers for the most part.

        Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

        Comment


        • JV/Amir/TH/Hayes
          Monroe/2PAt/TH/Novak
          Ross/Barnes (trade for draft pick)/Novak
          DeMar/Ross/Fields
          Lowry/Vasquez/2nd rounder

          We need more size and Monroe can do that for us. When JV subs out Amir comes in and plays along side Monroe, Monroe comes out 2Pat comes in to play with Amir. It would be a nice 4 more rotation. Same thing with DeMar, Barnes and Ross, those three would use up all the wing minutes, with maybe Vasquez taking the leftovers. If Barnes, JV and Ross can take another leap in their development we could have a contender.

          Comment


          • OldSkoolCool wrote: View Post
            I just think that Waiters ability to handle and score as a sixth man is a very valuable skill to a team concept. I like one primary scorer off the bench, rather than having all the scoring punch in our starting unit, because it balances the team so your bench can hold or even extend leads. The lack of bench was really evident when Pattman went down and we needed to lean heavily on Vasquez. I would sacrifice some scoring from our starting unit for more defense, and have a stronger 3 man rotation off the bench.

            I would also look at Jordan Crawford in the offseason to fill this role. Or Carlos Delfino (less scoring, but more D) in a Bucks trade. PJ3 is a defensive specialist.

            For example. A lineup of:

            Lowry/De Colo
            Ross/[Delfino]
            Giannis/[PJ3]
            Amir/Pattman
            Val

            is a very strong starting and bench unit. Every position is able to defend (except Crawford). Scoring from the starting unit is very balanced, makes us harder to defend. Depending on the development from the young guys that team has the potential to be a consistent top 4 team in the East for many years.

            Similar thing with Waiters, except less D and a big question mark at SF...both things I covered in my original post.

            Lowry/De Colo
            Ross/Waiters
            [PJ3]
            Amir/Pattman
            Val
            Both of those lineups are worse than our current one...

            *Sigh* I really shouldn't need to do this, but I'll explain why.

            The first lineup only has 1 shot creator in it (Lowry), that's a serious problem. Especially considering that you don't even get any spacing either because you have 3 guys (Po, Amir, JV) that aren't good shooters. So now you're basically asking Lowry to break down the defense on every possession and try to get easy looks for everyone. He's not Chris Paul, so that's a major problem (even for CP3 that would be a huge issue).

            The second lineup is also obviously worse. First of all you made the starting lineup weak as hell by having PJ3 in it. Secondly, you basically exchanged Waiters for Vasquez in the backup combo-guard role. At this point that is actually a SIGNIFICANT downgrade. Vasquez is equal to or better than Waiters at basically every relevant facet of the game.

            PTS/36: Vasquez (15.1), Waiters (19.3) --- So Waiters scores more that's about it.

            AST/36: Vasquez (6.5), Waiters (3.7)

            REB/36: Vasquez (3.5), Waiters (3.4)

            TS%: Vasquez (52.8%), Waiters (50.5%) --- Vasquez is a more efficient scorer

            eFG%: Vasquez (49.4%), Waiters (47.7%) --- Vasquez is a better shooter, also makes more threes at the same percentage.

            AST%: Vasquez (30.2%), Waiters (18.4%) --- Vasquez produces significantly more assists with his possessions, superior playmaker. His AST% to TO% ratio is also much better than Waiters'.

            Neither player is a particularly good defender, but Vasquez at 6'6 has more size to match up with bigger twos defensively.

            So there's no upgrade at all. You lose playmaking ability and exchange it for less efficient scoring. At the same time you also make our starting lineup worse by bringing in PJ3.
            Last edited by imanshumpert; Mon Apr 14, 2014, 12:08 PM.

            Comment


            • enlightenment wrote: View Post
              This is a shitty conversation... sorry fellas but there is no way Dion Waiters should be able to illicit such long paragraphs. The guy is a legit scrub.
              Dunno about a scrub, but I do also find it fascinating that Waiters has been a focal point of such a lengthy debate!
              Do carry on.

              Last edited by BigCamB; Mon Apr 14, 2014, 12:24 PM.

              Comment


              • saints91 wrote: View Post
                JV/Amir/TH/Hayes
                Monroe/2PAt/TH/Novak
                Ross/Barnes (trade for draft pick)/Novak
                DeMar/Ross/Fields
                Lowry/Vasquez/2nd rounder

                We need more size and Monroe can do that for us. When JV subs out Amir comes in and plays along side Monroe, Monroe comes out 2Pat comes in to play with Amir. It would be a nice 4 more rotation. Same thing with DeMar, Barnes and Ross, those three would use up all the wing minutes, with maybe Vasquez taking the leftovers. If Barnes, JV and Ross can take another leap in their development we could have a contender.
                I like the Barnes idea for our draft pick....but I'm not entirely sold on Monroe making our starting lineup better than Amir. Amir is very good defensively...Monroe not so much. I think I would take the pass on trying to attract him via RFA which would likely see us end up with a very inflated contract. Unless you have a trade that makes sense for both teams?

                imanshumpert wrote: View Post
                Both of those lineups are worse than our current one...

                *Sigh* I really shouldn't need to do this, but I'll explain why.

                The first lineup only has 1 shot creator in it (Lowry), that's a serious problem. Especially considering that you don't even get any spacing either because you have 3 guys (Po, Amir, JV) that aren't good shooters. So now you're basically asking Lowry to break down the defense on every possession and try to get easy looks for everyone. He's not Chris Paul, so that's a major problem (even for CP3 that would be a huge issue).
                Umm Giannis is a good shot creator and a better shooter than you would think. 33% from three in his rookie season is not bad. Giannis is a SF who can run an offensive set and he has been doing this as a rookie so saying that ALL the play making goes on Lowry is a bit of a misnomer. Giannis would actually allow Lowry to play off the ball more than he can with DD (as DD is not a playmaker/running offensive sets)

                Yes I admit, next season we would be worse. But the seasons after that I would have to argue that we would be much much better as Giannis develops. We would be a MUCH better defensive team, and a more rounded offensive team. The more people who are relied on to score makes the team stronger because if one person is shut down another steps up (SAS)

                imanshumpert wrote: View Post
                The second lineup is also obviously worse. First of all you made the starting lineup weak as hell by having PJ3 in it. Secondly, you basically exchanged Waiters for Vasquez in the backup combo-guard role. At this point that is actually a SIGNIFICANT downgrade. Vasquez is equal to or better than Waiters at basically every relevant facet of the game.
                Hence why I said there is a problem with SF. You don't need to grill me for something that I already know is an issue. I'm done with this issue. Waiters is obviously Araujo.

                Comment


                • OldSkoolCool wrote: View Post
                  Yes I admit, next season we would be worse. But the seasons after that I would have to argue that we would be much much better as Giannis develops. We would be a MUCH better defensive team, and a more rounded offensive team. The more people who are relied on to score makes the team stronger because if one person is shut down another steps up (SAS)
                  Only going to respond to this because I've beaten the rest to death already.

                  If Lowry gets shut down who's going to fill the void for him? You can't have a team entirely loaded with finishers/role players. You need multiple guys capable of creating their own baskets as well. It's cool to make the San Antonio Spurs comparison, but it's not the Danny Greens and Kawhi Leonards of the world that make that team. Those players are able to thrive because they play off 3 star guys that consistently put pressure on the defense in Parker, Manu and Duncan.

                  Comment


                  • imanshumpert wrote: View Post
                    Only going to respond to this because I've beaten the rest to death already.

                    If Lowry gets shut down who's going to fill the void for him? You can't have a team entirely loaded with finishers/role players. You need multiple guys capable of creating their own baskets as well. It's cool to make the San Antonio Spurs comparison, but it's not the Danny Greens and Kawhi Leonards of the world that make that team. Those players are able to thrive because they play off 3 star guys that consistently put pressure on the defense in Parker, Manu and Duncan.
                    Read. My. Posts.

                    OldSkoolCool wrote: View Post
                    Umm Giannis is a good shot creator and a better shooter than you would think. 33% from three in his rookie season is not bad. Giannis is a SF who can run an offensive set and he has been doing this as a rookie so saying that ALL the play making goes on Lowry is a bit of a misnomer. Giannis would actually allow Lowry to play off the ball more than he can with DD (as DD is not a playmaker/running offensive sets)
                    Also add in that Val should be able to handle a bigger role next season, as will Ross.

                    Giannis (as is) will give us more "guys capable of creating their own baskets" than DD. Also don't know why you are implying that DD is good at creating his won shot...DD is not very good at creating his own shot, and mainly relies on the pin down screens to be able to get his offense.

                    Comment


                    • Giannis offensively is a SF but he is rail thin and lacks strength. His length helps with steals and shot defense but he gets bullied by bigger players. He is a couple of years away from being a good player. Wiggins and Gianis will probably be all-stars but Wiggins will get there sooner. Gianni's is still all potential vs good

                      Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

                      Comment


                      • raptors999 wrote: View Post
                        Giannis offensively is a SF but he is rail thin and lacks strength. His length helps with steals and shot defense but he gets bullied by bigger players. He is a couple of years away from being a good player. Wiggins and Gianis will probably be all-stars but Wiggins will get there sooner. Gianni's is still all potential vs good
                        I agree. He will never be all that strong, but I doubt it will hold him back much defensively because he is so long. As long as he is quick with his feet and is able to slide in front of the drive then he will be a very good defender. His length will allow him to play off people, as well as block them if they take him into the post, this is why he gets referenced to Durant so often. Obviously he will still need to get stronger, and the strength will help.

                        His offensive game will suffer the most as strength is what will hold him back from getting to and finishing at the rim.

                        He is a big project. I would say that by his 3rd season is when he starts to come into his own, next year is going to have a few speed bumps as he tries to do more and use his shot more.

                        Comment


                        • Giannis could be like McGrady drafted too soon becoming a superstar when he is an RFA. Wiggins will be good rookie season

                          Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

                          Comment


                          • At that point however it would be best to hold his RFA rights

                            Comment


                            • OldSkoolCool wrote: View Post
                              At that point however it would be best to hold his RFA rights
                              Damn wookie, you and shump just wrote essays on essays about Dixon waiters

                              And for the record I think you are the only guy on the forum who whines waiters I better
                              I'm back. I no longer worship joe johnson

                              Comment


                              • The question is what timetable are the Bucks projecting to be competitive. They should dump Sanders and get Embid they are prob at least three years away.

                                Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X