We already have the perfect SF

[yabadabayolo]

Yeah, shut him down, which is why we won the series and Johnson was one of the biggest reasons why.

When he guarded joe penis, penis didn't score and I recall him getting a few turnovers in the limited minuets he played. So take that to your 170 million dollar pile of hot garbage. And say hey to the empty Barclays centre for me, just like during the playoffs, your stadium was empty until like the 4th hahahahaha

[Brooklyn Baller]

When he guarded joe penis, penis didn't score and I recall him getting a few turnovers in the limited minuets he played. So take that to your 170 million dollar pile of hot garbage. And say hey to the empty Barclays centre for me, just like during the playoffs, your stadium was empty until like the 4th hahahahaha

Keep being mad bro

[Joey]

Keep being mad bro

Why should any of us be mad? We're actually going somewhere as a team. You? Well... you paid $200M for the smallest "championship window" (if you can even call it that) in history. And your fan base is shit. Bunch of hipster losers.

[mcHAPPY]

Why should any of us be mad? We're actually going somewhere as a team. You? Well... you paid $200M for the smallest "championship window" (if you can even call it that) in history. And your fan base is shit. Bunch of hipster losers.

Going to be hilarious watching draft after draft play out as Williams makes max money declining year and Lopez suffering from Ming-itis:

2014 first round draft pick to Boston
Brooklyn's 2014 1st round pick to Boston [Boston-Brooklyn, 7/12/2013]

2014 second round draft pick to Philadelphia
Brooklyn's 2014 2nd round pick to Philadelphia (via Boston to Dallas) [Boston-Brooklyn, 6/23/2011 and then Boston-Dallas, 6/27/2013 and then Dallas-Philadelphia, 6/27/2013]

2015 first round draft pick to Atlanta
Atlanta has the right to swap its 2015 1st round pick for Brooklyn's 2015 1st round pick [Atlanta-Brooklyn, 7/11/2012]

2015 second round draft pick to Atlanta
Brooklyn's 2015 2nd round pick to Atlanta (via Utah) [Brooklyn-Utah, 12/22/2011 and then Atlanta-Utah, 6/27/2013]

2016 first round draft pick to Boston
Brooklyn's 2016 1st round pick to Boston [Boston-Brooklyn, 7/12/2013]

2016 second round draft pick to L.A. Clippers
L.A. Clippers have the right to swap their 2016 2nd round pick protected for selections 56-60 for Brooklyn's 2016 2nd round pick (if the L.A. Clippers’ pick falls within its protected range, then the L.A. Clippers’ swap right and Brooklyn’s obligation to the L.A. Clippers will be extinguished) [Brooklyn-L.A. Clippers, 7/11/2012]; L.A. Clippers may convey their 2016 2nd round pick and the above swap right to Milwaukee (see L.A. Clippers Debits)

2017 first round draft pick to Boston
Boston has the right to swap its 2017 1st round pick for Brooklyn's 2017 1st round pick; if Boston exercises this swap right, then Boston will convey its 2017 2nd round pick to Brooklyn protected for selections 31-45 (if this pick falls within its protected range and is therefore not conveyed, then Boston's obligation to Brooklyn will be extinguished) [Boston-Brooklyn, 7/12/2013]

2017 second round draft pick to Atlanta
Brooklyn's 2017 2nd round pick to Atlanta [Atlanta-Brooklyn, 7/11/2012]

2018 first round draft pick to Boston
Brooklyn's 2018 1st round pick to Boston [Boston-Brooklyn, 7/12/2013]

[Bendit]

Going to be hilarious watching draft after draft play out as Williams makes max money declining year and Lopez suffering from Ming-itis:

The upcoming years drafts status of the Nets is puzzling. How come they were able to trade their 1st in consecutive years? Thought this was against the rules (the save the franchise from it's management rule).

EDit: Oh nevermind...they used the "swap"!

[white men can't jump]

The upcoming years drafts status of the Nets is puzzling. How come they were able to trade their 1st in consecutive years? Thought this was against the rules (the save the franchise from it's management rule).

Because they aren't actually trading away the picks in consecutive years. The 2015 and 2017 picks are swaps, therefore they'll still have picks in those years, just they'll be the worst of 2 possibilities.

What's even more alarming is that I don't know if any of those picks from Brooklyn are protected. I don't think so. It's not outlandish to think Brooklyn could fall apart badly in the next few years and that Boston may get one or several high lottery picks.

[mcHAPPY]

Because they aren't actually trading away the picks in consecutive years. The 2015 and 2017 picks are swaps, therefore they'll still have picks in those years, just they'll be the worst of 2 possibilities.

What's even more alarming is that I don't know if any of those picks from Brooklyn are protected. I don't think so. It's not outlandish to think Brooklyn could fall apart badly in the next few years and that Boston may get one or several high lottery picks.

They are not.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

[007]

They are not.


BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

Oh god, they could get the number one pick and have to give it away!

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[white men can't jump]

Oh god, they could get the number one pick and have to give it away!

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

If they fall apart really badly as soon as next year, stay bad, and the stars align just right, they could end up having to give away 4 straight number one picks.

[Joey]

If they fall apart really badly as soon as next year, stay bad, and the stars align just right, they could end up having to give away 4 straight number one picks.

Suddenly Cleveland's management team seems slightly more capable.

[007]

Suddenly Cleveland's management team seems slightly more capable.

Just slightly

[Puffer]

Are you guys really debating how a SF who can't shoot, and has barely played is an answer to your problems?

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Frequently the presumption on this forum is that if you can post, you can read and you are expected to have read the previous posts before you leave one of your own.

So let me summarize for you as you seem confused.
1. Fields has been injured.
2. Before his injury Fields was able to show a complete skill set, both offensively and defensively.
3. Even after his injury his defense was very good and the Raptors, in the previous seasons, have used him against the other teams highest scorers, even to the point of putting him, quite successfully, on LeBron, Pierce and Mr. Penis.
4. Dan has dug deep and pulled up numbers to show that, even with a broken shot, Fields makes his team mates better when he is on the floor.
5. The OP suggested that Fields injury issues may be behind him, in which case the Raps get back the Fields they initially signed i.e. the one who had at the very least the ability of Rookie Fields, with the added experience of several years in the NBA.

Now you can easily see why anyone would seriously suggest that Fields is an answer at SF.

You do realize that Casey played John Salmons 20+ minutes a game...and the Raptors had their best season ever...and that Fields was better than Salmons even playing with no shot?

Hope this helps.

[ezz_bee]

Frequently the presumption on this forum is that if you can post, you can read and you are expected to have read the previous posts before you leave one of your own.

So let me summarize for you as you seem confused.
1. Fields has been injured.
2. Before his injury Fields was able to show a complete skill set, both offensively and defensively.
3. Even after his injury his defense was very good and the Raptors, in the previous seasons, have used him against the other teams highest scorers, even to the point of putting him, quite successfully, on LeBron, Pierce and Mr. Penis.
4. Dan has dug deep and pulled up numbers to show that, even with a broken shot, Fields makes his team mates better when he is on the floor.
5. The OP suggested that Fields injury issues may be behind him, in which case the Raps get back the Fields they initially signed i.e. the one who had at the very least the ability of Rookie Fields, with the added experience of several years in the NBA.

Now you can easily see why anyone would seriously suggest that Fields is an answer at SF.

You do realize that Casey played John Salmons 20+ minutes a game...and the Raptors had their best season ever...and that Fields was better than Salmons even playing with no shot?

Hope this helps.

The more you know!

[NoPropsneeded]

Keep being mad bro

So are we keeping this guy around just to diss him and his shitty team?

[thead]

So are we keeping this guy around just to diss him and his shitty team?

yup