Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

top 500 is back

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Employee wrote: View Post
    Rudy Gay was 15 at one time?! Whoa.
    Nah, 55. 15 is where the average top player on a team will be ranked.
    twitter.com/dhackett1565

    Comment


    • #47
      Oh werd. I get it.
      Eh follow my TWITTER!

      Comment


      • #48
        Hansbrough at 252.

        15
        45
        75
        105
        135
        165
        195
        225
        255
        285: Hansbrough 252 (+33)
        315: Hayes 278 (+37)
        345: Fields 293 (+52)
        375: Stiemsma 355 (+20) - I figure Stiemsma is less likely to be cut than Hamilton and Cherry
        405: Nogueira 384 (+21)
        435: Caboclo 455 (-20)
        twitter.com/dhackett1565

        Comment


        • #49
          DanH wrote: View Post
          Hansbrough at 252.
          How far the mighty have fallen!

          Comment


          • #50
            And there's JJ at 248.


            15
            45
            75
            105
            135
            165
            195
            225
            255: James Johnson 248 (+7)
            285: Hansbrough 252 (+33)
            315: Hayes 278 (+37)
            345: Fields 293 (+52)
            375: Stiemsma 355 (+20)
            405: Nogueira 384 (+21)
            435: Caboclo 455 (-20)
            twitter.com/dhackett1565

            Comment


            • #51
              So far we're plus at everyone but Bruno.
              The name's Bond, James Bond.

              Comment


              • #52
                I expect a bit of a wait before we see another raptor. Williams, Patterson, Vasquez should all be 175 or better.

                Comment


                • #53
                  http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/11...nkings-241-260

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    octothorp wrote: View Post
                    For comparison, last year (start of season)

                    15: Gay 55 (-40)
                    45: Lowry 78 (-33)
                    75: Valanciunas 82 (-7)
                    105: DeRozan 104 (+1)
                    135: Johnson 165 (-30)
                    165: Ross 203 (-38)
                    195: Hansbrough 208 (-13)
                    225: Augustin 227 (-2)
                    255: Fields 248 (+7)
                    285: Novak 251 (+34)
                    315: Daye 286 (+29)
                    345: Gray 345 (0)
                    375: Acy 373 (+2)
                    405: Buycks 435 (-30)
                    435: Stone 476 (-41)

                    And then post trades:
                    15: Lowry 78 (-63)
                    45: Valanciunas 82 (-37)
                    75: DeRozan 104 (-29)
                    105: Vasquez 124 (-19)
                    135: Johnson 165 (-30)
                    165: Patterson 167 (-2)
                    195: Ross 203 (-8)
                    225: Hansbrough 208 (+17)
                    255: Hayes 230 (+25)
                    285: Fields 248 (+37)
                    315: Novak 251 (+64)
                    345: Salmons 289 (+44)
                    375: de Colo 322 (+53)
                    405: Buycks 435 (-30)
                    435: Stone 476 (-41)
                    DanH wrote: View Post
                    Hansbrough at 252.

                    15
                    45
                    75
                    105
                    135
                    165
                    195
                    225
                    255
                    285: Hansbrough 252 (+33)
                    315: Hayes 278 (+37)
                    345: Fields 293 (+52)
                    375: Stiemsma 355 (+20) - I figure Stiemsma is less likely to be cut than Hamilton and Cherry
                    405: Nogueira 384 (+21)
                    435: Caboclo 455 (-20)

                    this is a great way to measure this. kind of gives some semblance of it meaning something and makes it measurable

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      JJ at 248. Looks like another plus.
                      The name's Bond, James Bond.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Bargnani's at 227, a drop of 84 for him. Meaning we've got 8 players on our team that are higher-ranked than Bargnani.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          octothorp wrote: View Post
                          Bargnani's at 227, a drop of 84 for him. Meaning we've got 8 players on our team that are higher-ranked than Bargnani.
                          See that's why ESPN rank is such a joke. I would've said it's more like 10 or 11.
                          Eh follow my TWITTER!

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            octothorp wrote: View Post
                            Bargnani's at 227, a drop of 84 for him. Meaning we've got 8 players on our team that are higher-ranked than Bargnani.
                            This right here cost him 75 spots:



                            Loooooove the bench reaction!
                            "We're playing in a building." -- Kawhi Leonard

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/11...nkings-221-240

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                octothorp wrote: View Post
                                Bargnani's at 227, a drop of 84 for him. Meaning we've got 8 players on our team that are higher-ranked than Bargnani.
                                i think he could do well in the triangle, like kukoc

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X