Whats to overturn? That Sac supposedly got a finger on the ball, without actually deflecting it?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Game #11: Memphis Grizzlies 92 - Toronto Raptors 96
Collapse
X
-
The Kings GM's reaction was the best. Literally blew a blood vessel in his right eye as a result.
The Kings have a legitimate case to get it overturned... it's impossible to make the kind of mid-air, turnaround layup that Courtney Lee did in about 0.3 seconds. Only tip-ins at the rim can be done in 0.3 seconds. Plus if the refs controlled the game clock and were a fraction of a second late in starting the clock, it would show gross negligence on the part of the referees. In the Stern era, this would've never been overturned. Silver though seems to be that kind of commissioner who's more transparent and will not cover up for people's mistakes.Give me liberty or give me a bran muffin! - Colin Mochrie
Comment
-
Raptors allowing 19 pts MORE per 100 possessions without James Johnson on the floor (108.3 in 286 mins/89.6 in 194 mins with him on floor)
— Josh Lewenberg (@JLew1050) November 18, 2014
Comment
-
rocwell wrote: View PostRaptors allowing 19 pts MORE per 100 possessions without James Johnson on the floor (108.3 in 286 mins/89.6 in 194 mins with him on floor)
— Josh Lewenberg (@JLew1050) November 18, 2014
Only one thing matters: We The Champs.
Comment
-
kopite91 wrote: View PostThe Kings GM's reaction was the best. Literally blew a blood vessel in his right eye as a result.
The Kings have a legitimate case to get it overturned... it's impossible to make the kind of mid-air, turnaround layup that Courtney Lee did in about 0.3 seconds. Only tip-ins at the rim can be done in 0.3 seconds. Plus if the refs controlled the game clock and were a fraction of a second late in starting the clock, it would show gross negligence on the part of the referees. In the Stern era, this would've never been overturned. Silver though seems to be that kind of commissioner who's more transparent and will not cover up for people's mistakes.
Comment
-
iblastoff wrote: View Postit wasnt a turnaround layup. he caught it and tossed it up. and refs controlling the clock is not 'gross-negligence'. not sure why that would ever be the case. theres no way a human reaction could literally start the clock exactly when the ball is touched. there will be a slight delay regardless.Only one thing matters: We The Champs.
Comment
-
MixxAOR wrote: View PostNo no. Kings are arguing that when Vince passed it, inbounds defender tipped the pass and Lee caught it. So clock should've started when defender tipped it.Twitter @WJ_FINDLAY
Comment
-
WJF wrote: View PostThat is argument #1, they are also saying that they have timed the amount of time the ball was in Lee's hands and it was somehing like .322 seconds, longer than the 3/10s on the clock, so they have 2 ways it could be overturned.Only one thing matters: We The Champs.
Comment
Comment