Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: RR's Tom Liston & Michael Grange On the Merits of Tanking

  1. #1
    Administrator Dr. James Naismith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Almonte
    Posts
    4,294
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default RR's Tom Liston & Michael Grange On the Merits of Tanking

    Not sure how long ago you had the arguement with Grange Tom, but kudos to the mention again.

    It does open one's eyes a bit too and wonder.

    My overwhelming thought watching the Raptors somehow lose to Golden State the other day was this: Why didnít the Raptors draft Stephen Curry?

    Itís pretty clear on the strength of his play this year heís going to be a very special player. Is he the bundle of athletic potential that Derrick Rose is? No. But neither is Steve Nash, and he gets by pretty well. Watching Curry live, thatís what came to mind. Heís nowhere near the ball-handler Nash is yet. And itís probably a reach to suggest heíll ever be quite the passer Nash has proven to be. But he plays with the same calm, focused intensity. Heís much quicker and more athletic than his jumping ability (above average, but not great spectacular) would lead people to believe. And my God can he shoot, which in the case of each player compliments everything they do, rather defines it. And plus he likes the city and his girlfriendís family is from here.

    The easy answer to the question is that the Raptors were picking ninth and Curry was taken seventh.

    But Iím also curious why the Raptors didnít draft Ricky Rubio (taken fifth)? Or even Tyreke Evans, who went fourth?

    This is nothing against DeMar DeRozan exactly. Heís been just as advertised: A very athletic player with limited elite basketball experience who has at time shone in his first NBA season but more often has been kind of meh. Heís no Sonny Weems, in other words. Heís put in a lot of time on his game and will surely become the player heís destined to be, itís just yet to be determined what kind of player that is.

    But wouldnít the tone of the discussion right now be a little different if the Raptors had a rookie in the fold who not only was significant, game-changing talent, but quite likely a potential star?

    Can we agree on that?

    Which brings me to myself. A year ago the Raptors were on a winning streak, one that ended up with them finishing 9-4 in their last 13 games. What a waste.

    This is what I wrote then in response to Tom Liston of Raptors Republic who Ė as a season ticket holder Ė objected to my argument then on the merits of tanking.

    ďPresuming the Raptors scouting staff would never get this wrong, they should get a better player picking 5th than 9th, or 8th than 9th, for that matter. And I guess my view is that if you're going to miss the playoffs or just make them and get crushed in the first round, better to pick fifth than 13th, or 16th. But hey, easy for me to say.Ē
    Source - Click here

  2. #2
    Raptors Republic Superstar Hotshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,551
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Talk about stating the obvious.

    Curry flourished in GS because of the Don Nelson system that causes players to pad their stats but doesn't neccessarly translate in wins.

    Demar has a learning curve and the Raptors knew that when they drafted him so to expect for him to be an impact player (when they also limit his minutes) in his first season is a bit too much to ask. Judge this draft by the end of its third season where I believe Demar will have a break out year.

    The biggest dissapointment of Colangelo was not being able to sign John Salmon 3 seasons ago (because god told him ) that would have solved some of the headaches today if it were done.

  3. #3
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    557
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Curry will be a good player in this league. If he is lucky, he will land on a team that can hide his deficient defence. On this Rpators team, imagine a backcourt of Jose and Curry - we would be giving up even more points per game.

    Curry has the potential to be what Mike Bibby was in his prime. A dead eye shooter with good passing skills, but marginal ability to drive to the net, and limited lateral quicks. Decent stealer though.

    Tyreke still has the most potential of all the picks though. He could be the next D-Wade.

  4. #4
    Administrator Apollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    12,396
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I don't care what system Curry is in, that boy has got some great skills. Not sure how you can discredit a player solely due to the system he plays under.

  5. #5
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    557
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Re Tanking this season - I would rather lose the pick this year, than lose it next year. Colangelo clearly is not excited about what he could get with a first round pick this year, or he would not have included it in the trade.

    Plus, if I am correct, the Raps are on a downward course for a couple of years because Turk and Calderon are aging, not entering their prime, and those are two difficult to move contracts.

  6. #6
    Administrator Apollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    12,396
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    EDIT: see below. Lotto protected for five years.
    Last edited by Apollo; Wed Apr 7th, 2010 at 04:21 PM.

  7. #7
    Administrator Apollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    12,396
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The deal also calls for Toronto to get the league's maximum allowed in cash considerations ($3 million) and for the Heat to land a conditional first-round pick to come sometime between 2010 and 2015. It's lottery-protected, essentially meaning the first time the Raptors make the playoffs after this season, their first-rounder goes to Miami.
    ESPN.com

  8. #8
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    574
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Great trade by Colangelo. I remember when it went down, he was very apprehensive of giving up the pick.

    If only Isiah had gotten to page four of the gm's manual where it describes the rationale behind protecting 1st round picks.

    I don't know why people hate on Curry, the kid is amazing. Great fundamentals, great feel for the game and has JR Smith range without the luggage. I see him emulating Steve Nash more than anyone, little more athletic without as much vision.

    If GS can get something for Ellis, draft well and stay healthy next year, they are going to be on the play off bubble.

  9. #9
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    884
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Apollo wrote: View Post
    I don't care what system Curry is in, that boy has got some great skills. Not sure how you can discredit a player solely due to the system he plays under.
    Agreed -- and I think Curry would look phenomenal in the Raptors offense. Absolutely phenomenal.

  10. #10
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    273
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I can see the benefit of tanking, I still don't get why tanking and merits are used in the same phrase.

    Tanking is so wrong for a franchise for many perspectives:
    1. The NBA is business. The season ticket holder pays a lot of $$$ to see professional basketball every game. Once you lose the faith of season ticket holders, you may have hard time to get them back. Also, is hard to sell NBA merchandise when you team is "tanking"!
    2. A real NBA player should be professional and never accept to play under his capabilities.
    3. Good players still can be drafted in late first round draft.
    4. Winning mentality can't be built on tanking the season.


    I see tanking being an option, only if the team management decide to totally rebuild from scratch and for that matter they decide to trade their current assets for young players with potential or future draft picks (I.E. Nets). I still expect the young players to try their best to win games, but by GM's design the team is not good enough yet to compete. So, I don't see how tanking the last 5 games is going to drastically improve Raptors. If Bosh decides to leave and Collangelo trades a significant number of big contracts starting the rebuild from scratch, then you can tank next year. Don't expect the audience to be that much at ACC when Raptors plays in this case!

  11. #11
    Administrator Apollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    12,396
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Wait a second. Are people suggesting the team should tank or are people suggesting that the team missing the playoffs would be better for them than making the playoffs? I thought people were suggesting the later. The Raptors as a club would not be looking at tanking right now, they want to make it. The playoffs means making more money at the gate and through merchandise where as missing it merely gives them another talent to develop. Better believe they want that money first and foremost.

  12. #12
    Raptors Republic Rookie Liston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    187
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Doc Naismith wrote: View Post
    Not sure how long ago you had the arguement with Grange Tom, but kudos to the mention again.
    Here's the original http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sport...article977660/ link.

    I'm a big believer in having pride as an organization (basketball or otherwise). As well, I think you disrepect the game a bit by tanking.
    I want a winning and fighting atmosphere AT ALL TIMES. Losing breeds a losing atmosphere.

    I type this at the half of the Boston game tonight. Do tell me you don't love the fight we're giving them. I fully expect Pierce and company to pour it on - but can you imagine if we won without Bosh and Turkoglu. Talk about energizing a fan base.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •