When the Derrick Rose injury controversies were going on, Reggie Miller offered the player's perspective. He said, there's a difference between playing "hurt" and playing "injured". Playing "hurt" is when you're playing through pain, but you can't do further damage to the injury by playing. Playing "injured" also playing through pain, but also risking further damage - this is reckless and could be career threatening.
From the sounds of the Caroll-McKechnie quote, it implies that both guys knew that Carroll was "injured" (by Miller's definition) , so whomever made the collective call for Carroll to continue playing screwed that up badly. I'd say it's mostly on Carroll, but with a 99.99% certainty that the coaching staff and Masai also had that same information from McKechnie. If not, then it's all on McKechnie hiding that info, which would seem kind of bizarre for the coaching staff not to know. And the Dudley-Rivers situation would indicate similar bad judgment by Rivers and the Clips, which is basically the point Dudley is trying to make.
From the sounds of the Caroll-McKechnie quote, it implies that both guys knew that Carroll was "injured" (by Miller's definition) , so whomever made the collective call for Carroll to continue playing screwed that up badly. I'd say it's mostly on Carroll, but with a 99.99% certainty that the coaching staff and Masai also had that same information from McKechnie. If not, then it's all on McKechnie hiding that info, which would seem kind of bizarre for the coaching staff not to know. And the Dudley-Rivers situation would indicate similar bad judgment by Rivers and the Clips, which is basically the point Dudley is trying to make.
Comment