twins can go insane at any moment it's true
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
power forward prospects
Collapse
X
-
ceez wrote: View Postmorris is a twin and convicted felon
As of now, just an alleged felon.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk"Bruno?
Heh, if he is in the D-league still in a few years I will be surprised.
He's terrible."
-Superjudge, 7/23
Hope you're wrong.
Comment
-
Letter N wrote: View PostKief or Jones would make me very happy.
The downside to having a FO that doesn't have leaks is we have no idea which way Masai is leaning. It could be West, it could be Taj, it could be a trade, it could be nobody.Heir, Prince of Cambridge
If you see KeonClark in the wasteland, please share your food and water with him.
Comment
-
ceez wrote: View PostTerrence Jones is younger, cheaper and arguably better than Kenneth Faried. The end.
Younger and cheaper, but I would say he's just a poor man's Faried. He can handle the ball pretty well for a PF, but otherwise he's not better than Faried at anything. He's an athletic PF who can't shoot, plays bad defense, fits a run and gun offensive style well, rebounds pretty well, not a smart player. But unlike Faried, he's not an elite rebounder, he doesn't always play with energy, he can coast in some games, and he often plays soft.
I'm not really a big fan of either player for this team.
I'd take Faried if he doesn't cost much, like a low 1st rounder + Ross + cap space, or something like that. I think he's a nice player but not the best fit for our team.
I wouldn't give anything of value for Terrence Jones, I think Patrick Patterson is a better player.
Comment
-
BobLoblaw wrote: View PostYounger and cheaper, but I would say he's just a poor man's Faried. He can handle the ball pretty well for a PF, but otherwise he's not better than Faried at anything. He's an athletic PF who can't shoot, plays bad defense, fits a run and gun offensive style well, rebounds pretty well, not a smart player. But unlike Faried, he's not an elite rebounder, he doesn't always play with energy, he can coast in some games, and he often plays soft.
I'm not really a big fan of either player for this team.
I'd take Faried if he doesn't cost much, like a low 1st rounder + Ross + cap space, or something like that. I think he's a nice player but not the best fit for our team.
I wouldn't give anything of value for Terrence Jones, I think Patrick Patterson is a better player.@sweatpantsjer
Comment
-
Jones passes the eye test more than anyone else you guys have mentioned, nevermind the good stats he puts up, when he's on the court the only visible weakness he has is size, which he makes up for in athleticism, and just not having the greatest post up game (which we can make up for in JV). Honestly T jones and nobody else.
Comment
-
WhatRhymesWithCash wrote: View PostJones passes the eye test more than anyone else you guys have mentioned, nevermind the good stats he puts up, when he's on the court the only visible weakness he has is size, which he makes up for in athleticism, and just not having the greatest post up game (which we can make up for in JV). Honestly T jones and nobody else.Heir, Prince of Cambridge
If you see KeonClark in the wasteland, please share your food and water with him.
Comment
-
BobLoblaw wrote: View PostYounger and cheaper, but I would say he's just a poor man's Faried. He can handle the ball pretty well for a PF, but otherwise he's not better than Faried at anything. He's an athletic PF who can't shoot, plays bad defense, fits a run and gun offensive style well, rebounds pretty well, not a smart player. But unlike Faried, he's not an elite rebounder, he doesn't always play with energy, he can coast in some games, and he often plays soft.
I'm not really a big fan of either player for this team.
I'd take Faried if he doesn't cost much, like a low 1st rounder + Ross + cap space, or something like that. I think he's a nice player but not the best fit for our team.
I wouldn't give anything of value for Terrence Jones, I think Patrick Patterson is a better player.
Comment
Comment