I don't think the issue is so much tanking as it is bad decision-making, as you said Apollo.
Tanking is a perfectly viable and reasonable strategy if you're accurately valuing players.
But if you're trading Russell Westbrook (ranked 8th and only 27 years old) for an uncertain pick and Bruno Caboclo, which is essentially what that trade netted to (using basketball monster rankings at the time of the trade), you have badly misjudged both time and valuation.
In a dynasty league a couple of trades like that can mess with the competitive balance for years. As a hazy newcomer I thought I read that anything goes under the cap but a basic veto process could be helpful.
You don't want to hamstring active traders, but maybe if say 3 managers make a public vote for reviewing the deal, the managers in question should have to defend the deal before being subject to a group vote.
Tanking is a perfectly viable and reasonable strategy if you're accurately valuing players.
But if you're trading Russell Westbrook (ranked 8th and only 27 years old) for an uncertain pick and Bruno Caboclo, which is essentially what that trade netted to (using basketball monster rankings at the time of the trade), you have badly misjudged both time and valuation.
In a dynasty league a couple of trades like that can mess with the competitive balance for years. As a hazy newcomer I thought I read that anything goes under the cap but a basic veto process could be helpful.
You don't want to hamstring active traders, but maybe if say 3 managers make a public vote for reviewing the deal, the managers in question should have to defend the deal before being subject to a group vote.
Comment