Barolt wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Raptors 2016 Trade Deadline - Dec 15th 2015 - Feb 18th 2016 @ 3pm EST
Collapse
X
-
ball4life wrote: View PostWell my phone bill is $120 and my cable and internet are $100 combined.
Suck it up Bell & Rogers. You don't see me complaining.
I wish mine was close to that. I'm at ~$300 a month for cable and internet in Yellowknife.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
golden wrote: View PostNot likely, and especially not for a rental. That Nets pick has a realistic chance to become Ben Simmons. That has the potential to make one of those future "top 10 worst trades in NBA history", if Horford walked.
Comment
-
Changing the paradigm a little... What would it take to get Kelly Olynyk out of Boston ? He fits the bill nicely for what we are looking for ... A young PF that can hit the 3 at will and rebound a little...
Who / What does Danny boy ask for from us for Kelly ?
Biz and a 1st ? THey do need a C .. Sully and Zeller don't cut it.
Bebe and a better 1st ? The C plus a better pick .
Wright and better 1st ? They need a real facilitator at PG. Smart isn't it.Last edited by Demographic Shift; Mon Feb 1, 2016, 06:34 PM.There's no such thing as a 2nd round bust.
- TGO
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostNot $75M for the 3 maxes, because 2 of those would already be in their 2nd year, so you're short by $3.5M there. I'd also expect Lowry's contract to be at least $20M if he has another all-star year next year.
And what are you talking about? All 3 of them would be in the 1st year of their new maxes in 2016-17.
Or are you talking about getting Durant in 2017? I'm talking about this offseason.
Comment
-
JWash wrote: View PostI'm talking about for next season.
And what are you talking about? All 3 of them would be in the 1st year of their new maxes in 2016-17.
Or are you talking about getting Durant in 2017? I'm talking about this offseason.
EDIT: You're right, I messed up Durant's free agency year. Still, not sure why OKC would sign and trade him for Carroll/Patterson. That ain't enough for them to facilitate. If Durant leaves, they're probably going into rebuilding.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostLowry/DeMar/Horford is a good core, but not a championship level squad as long as the Warriors and Spurs are still in the NBA.
IMO this trade (Ross, JJ, Scola & NY first) makes us a lot better now with a much better chance of getting out of East.
Is it enough/too much for Horford?
I believe this is a fair deal (IMO) for both sides (perhaps with some "tweaking").
We are not mortgaging future (still have our "young potential: Bebe, Bruno...), while Atl may not get much more (since Horford will be an UFA).
What if both him & DD leave? That's a chance certainly. But would you leave a well balance team of 5 all stars (or near) especially if money is competitive?
ps: I'd be curious if we could keep JJ (temp SF till Carroll returns, an insurance for injury & James defender No 2)?
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostYeah, I was talking about when Durant would show up.
EDIT: You're right, I messed up Durant's free agency year. Still, not sure why OKC would sign and trade him for Carroll/Patterson. That ain't enough for them to facilitate. If Durant leaves, they're probably going into rebuilding.
Comment
-
JWash wrote: View PostWell for just the starting 5 you're looking at $12M+$75M (3 maxes)+$15M so about $102M. Then if you get say Biyombo for like $5M (not sure what the exact MLE is), CoJo is still getting $7M, Bruno and Bebe at $4M and then assume our pick was part of the S&T for KD. That's $118M for 8 players. Fill out the rest with minimums probably $122-125M payroll.
We'd be over the luxury tax line by about $15M. But then the next season the tax line increases to $127M (we'd still be over because of salary increases unless we let Lowry go), so we'd be over the tax by at least a good $10M for the duration of KD/DD/Horford's deals.
But from what I understand MLSE would be willing to payout cash for a championship level team (that most certainly would be, dynasty potential even) so I don't think money would be the roadblock there.
Fuck yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment
-
Mapko wrote: View PostIf KD leaves OKC will not go in rebuilding. Their complete management/ownership will be jumping of a bridge.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
-
Barolt wrote: View PostEven if they don't go into rebuilding, if Durant is leaving, why take Carroll/Patterson? Is that really better than $25M in cap space to target someone to put beside Russ/Ibaka?9 time first team all-RR, First Ballot Hall of Forum
Comment
-
It is possible to have a lowry/demar/durant/horford/jv combo
But why?
Outside of sentimentality towards demar....who would be at best 3rd optionand 25 million per when a cheap 3 and d player and bench depth would be better and cheaper?
Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Mapko wrote: View PostLets figure out how to get past Cavs & Bulls & ...then we will deal with GS & SA.
IMO this trade (Ross, JJ, Scola & NY first) makes us a lot better now with a much better chance of getting out of East.
Is it enough/too much for Horford?
I believe this is a fair deal (IMO) for both sides (perhaps with some "tweaking").
We are not mortgaging future (still have our "young potential: Bebe, Bruno...), while Atl may not get much more (since Horford will be an UFA).
What if both him & DD leave? That's a chance certainly. But would you leave a well balance team of 5 all stars (or near) especially if money is competitive?
ps: I'd be curious if we could keep JJ (temp SF till Carroll returns, an insurance for injury & James defender No 2)?
Comment
-
Snooch wrote: View PostIt is possible to have a lowry/demar/durant/horford/jv combo
But why?
Outside of sentimentality towards demar....who would be at best 3rd optionand 25 million per when a cheap 3 and d player and bench depth would be better and cheaper?
Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Primer wrote: View PostThe Durant S&T for Carroll and PPat is not realistic, but a fun thought.twitter.com/anthonysmdoyle
Comment
Comment