Hmmmm .... so, although it was only one game and was against a weaker opponent in the Wolves, are we one cusp of yet another point guard controversy here in Toronto ala "Forderon"? This one known as "Cack".
Tonight was the perfect example on how effective Jack can be when his role is to lead and facilitate as a PG. Not as a SG like Jay has played him for a good chunk of the season so far, but strictly as the point guard. Was effective on the fast break; even better with the the drive and dish, gritty and hustling (even diving for the loose ball twice) and relentless in the 4th quarter when we needed someone to step up and take control the most. That's what a "floor general" does.
So, albeit Jose's a good point guard, and Jack understands his role on this team, are we on the verge of having yet another controversy and repetitive debate about who's game we need more running the point? Jose's or Jack's?
Tonight was the perfect example on how effective Jack can be when his role is to lead and facilitate as a PG. Not as a SG like Jay has played him for a good chunk of the season so far, but strictly as the point guard. Was effective on the fast break; even better with the the drive and dish, gritty and hustling (even diving for the loose ball twice) and relentless in the 4th quarter when we needed someone to step up and take control the most. That's what a "floor general" does.
So, albeit Jose's a good point guard, and Jack understands his role on this team, are we on the verge of having yet another controversy and repetitive debate about who's game we need more running the point? Jose's or Jack's?
Comment