mobil porno porno izle porno
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Chris Bosh / Ewing Theory

  1. #21
    Administrator Apollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    12,570
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Brain Colangelo wrote: View Post
    Ewing Theory
    One of Bill Simmons's most used internet themes has been the famous Ewing Theory, which was conceived by Dave Cirilli and named after Patrick Ewing of the New York Knicks. In 1998-99, the Knicks made the NBA Finals after Ewing sustained an Achilles' tendon injury. Thus, the Ewing Theory claims that when a longtime superstar who receives an inordinate amount of media attention and fan interest has never won a championship leaves the team via injury, trade, or free agency, and the media writes the team off, the team will play better.

    Is Chris Bosh good enough to qualify? Can the Raps be better without Bosh?
    Two first round exits? Absolutely not. Word around the league is that he's a fake tough guy. That's Durant being polite. Real word around the league is that he's soft.

  2. #22
    Raptors Republic Superstar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,942
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The Ewing Theory is completely flawed because Ewing was a shadow of his former self when that Simmons came up with that. In his prime, the Knicks were certainly not better when he was out. When he was old, he couldn't impact the game like he used to, but the team still played with him as if he was in his prime. It didn't work. If a team that had Shaq on it tried to play as if he was in his prime, they would play better when he was off the court. That's why he works in Boston. He's a role player who's playing a career low 20 mpg and only taking 5 shots per game. Ewing should have been relegated to a role player role when he hit, like, 35, but at 37 he was still playing more than 30 mpg and taking 12.5 shots per game.
    Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
    Follow me on Twitter.

  3. #23
    Raptors Republic All-Star
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,432
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote MangoKid wrote: View Post
    I think the theory applies to contenders. Even without Ewing, the Knicks still had a ton of talent - Sprewell, Johnson, Houston, Camby.

    The Cavs and Raptors didn't have a dearth of talent outside of the stars that left their respective clubs.

    Applies to contenders? LOL. The Ewing Theory doesn't apply to anything. I just don't understand why some people want to believe in this so badly that they start adding qualifiers to try and make it fit where it doesn't (i.e. mostly everywhere). IMO, it's a joke made up by Bill Simmons that probably has him laughing his ass off everytime somebody references it or tries to take it seriously.

  4. #24
    Super Moderator MangoKid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    3,142
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote golden wrote: View Post
    Applies to contenders? LOL. The Ewing Theory doesn't apply to anything. I just don't understand why some people want to believe in this so badly that they start adding qualifiers to try and make it fit where it doesn't (i.e. mostly everywhere). IMO, it's a joke made up by Bill Simmons that probably has him laughing his ass off everytime somebody references it or tries to take it seriously.
    Most veteran teams will play better together when their "star" falls victim to injury (simply because the vets pick up the slack). That's what the Ewing theory is.

    The Raptors are much better without Bosh at any rate. If he was still around, this team would still be playing mediocre baskteball. it would be better mediocre baskteball, but nonethless mediocre basketball.

  5. #25
    Super Moderator MangoKid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Scarborough
    Posts
    3,142
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Tim W. wrote: View Post
    The Ewing Theory is completely flawed because Ewing was a shadow of his former self when that Simmons came up with that. In his prime, the Knicks were certainly not better when he was out. When he was old, he couldn't impact the game like he used to, but the team still played with him as if he was in his prime. It didn't work. If a team that had Shaq on it tried to play as if he was in his prime, they would play better when he was off the court. That's why he works in Boston. He's a role player who's playing a career low 20 mpg and only taking 5 shots per game. Ewing should have been relegated to a role player role when he hit, like, 35, but at 37 he was still playing more than 30 mpg and taking 12.5 shots per game.
    I wouldn't say Ewing was a shadow of him former self. He was still averaging a double-double (17-10) with a couple of blocks per when the injury happened. The offense wasn't as good, but the defense was.

  6. #26
    Raptors Republic Superstar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,942
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote MangoKid wrote: View Post
    I wouldn't say Ewing was a shadow of him former self. He was still averaging a double-double (17-10) with a couple of blocks per when the injury happened. The offense wasn't as good, but the defense was.
    The stats were still decent, but he was being force fed the ball too much, and his defense was not nearly as good as it had been. I wouldn't even say it was good by his last season in NY because they played him too many minutes, and he was too slow. He was still an intimidator, but he was just not quick enough, especially at the end of games, to have much of an impact on defense.
    Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
    Follow me on Twitter.

  7. #27