Multipaul wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Raptors Interested in Jason Thompson
Collapse
X
-
MangoKid wrote: View PostI wouldn't want any part of Garcia or Dalembert just to get Thompson. That's a waste of the TPE. I'd rather not use it if that's teh case.
@Legalize-it: Who are you to tell me to stop posting?
Comment
-
JoePanini wrote: View PostWell Dalembert is actually a good center, and he's an expiring. Garcia is a very decent SG, but I couldn't remember him stepping on Bargnani, but I guess that's pretty assholish...
@Legalize-it: Who are you to tell me to stop posting?
Comment
-
you guys need to chill out. i can't really see how the math is THAT bad. i'm pretty sure he's talking about contracts over multiple years -- although the dalembert contract couldn't really factor too much into that since it is expiring.It's about money
Comment
-
Legalize-It wrote: View Postyou dont have to stop, but please try to minimize the BS. kno what i mean ?
And just for you to know. My addition is perfectly fine. If we do a trade of our 2nd round pick + TPE (to cover Dalembert's contract) for Jason Thompson ($3M) + Samuel Dalembert ($13.5M) + Francisco Garcia ($24M) that saves Kings 3+13.5+24=40M. When I posted that I didn't really bother to count, but it's $40M. And this trade doesn't look so bad on our side. We get a very good rebounder and defender in Dalembert who we can dump next year. We get the main target here who is Jason Thompson. We have to take Garcia's baggage and that's the only downside, but when you trade nothing for a lot, you always end up taking up baggage. Now please tell me what is so BS about this trade proposal?
Comment
-
JoePanini wrote: View Postminimize the BS? Who are you to judge me and what I say as BS. Honestly I don't see any BS in what I have posted. I offered a trade idea, which you have every right to disagree on and even add ideas onto, but even if the trade idea might not be the best it's not BS. So every other trade proposal on this forum is BS? Did you go through all my posts since I joined to check for my BS.
And just for you to know. My addition is perfectly fine. If we do a trade of our 2nd round pick + TPE (to cover Dalembert's contract) for Jason Thompson ($3M) + Samuel Dalembert ($13.5M) + Francisco Garcia ($24M) that saves Kings 3+13.5+24=40M. When I posted that I didn't really bother to count, but it's $40M. And this trade doesn't look so bad on our side. We get a very good rebounder and defender in Dalembert who we can dump next year. We get the main target here who is Jason Thompson. We have to take Garcia's baggage and that's the only downside, but when you trade nothing for a lot, you always end up taking up baggage. Now please tell me what is so BS about this trade proposal?
when you did your math did you ever think that by trading evans and banks that someone would still have to pay those two ?
hmmm
and you said they would give us a 1st round pick...now you change the trade and think no one caught ur bs.... pure bitch move joe...Last edited by Legalize-It; Thu Nov 18, 2010, 09:57 PM.
Comment
-
Legalize-It wrote: View Postno its bs when ur math is totally out of wack... and most of the other long pointless paragraphs you write...
when you did your math did you ever think that by trading evans and banks that someone would still have to pay those two ?
hmmm
and you said they would give us a 1st round pick...now you change the trade and think no one caught ur bs.... pure bitch move joe...
Comment
-
Maybe the Raptors trade Bayless to SAC for Thompson?
SAC reportedly offered Thompson to ATL for Teague.
Salaries match and the Raps have no back up C now - although they'd be pretty thin at the point if this happened, although one could argue Bayless is not a PG.
Comment
-
Matt52 wrote: View PostMaybe the Raptors trade Bayless to SAC for Thompson?
SAC reportedly offered Thompson to ATL for Teague.
Salaries match and the Raps have no back up C now - although they'd be pretty thin at the point if this happened, although one could argue Bayless is not a PG.Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
Follow me on Twitter.
Comment
-
Matt52 wrote: View PostMaybe the Raptors trade Bayless to SAC for Thompson?
SAC reportedly offered Thompson to ATL for Teague.
Salaries match and the Raps have no back up C now - although they'd be pretty thin at the point if this happened, although one could argue Bayless is not a PG.
Comment
-
Matt52 wrote: View PostMaybe the Raptors trade Bayless to SAC for Thompson?
SAC reportedly offered Thompson to ATL for Teague.
Salaries match and the Raps have no back up C now - although they'd be pretty thin at the point if this happened, although one could argue Bayless is not a PG.Read my blog, The Picket Fence. Guaranteed to make you think or your money back!
Follow me on Twitter.
Comment
-
Tim W. wrote: View PostOf course, if one of the reasons for doing the deal was to make room for Ed Davis, getting Jason THompson makes little sense.
Comment
-
Tim W. wrote: View PostOf course, if one of the reasons for doing the deal was to make room for Ed Davis, getting Jason THompson makes little sense.
PG: Calderon, Barbosa, 3rd string
SG: DD, Weems
SF: Kleiza, Peja, Wright
PF: Johnson, Davis, Dorsey
C: Bargs, Thompson, Alabi
I could live with that for the rest of the year notwithstanding any other possible trade, albeit they'd be thin at guard. Unless Evans could fetch a decent SG.Last edited by mcHAPPY; Sun Nov 21, 2010, 12:32 PM.
Comment
Comment