My contribution to MIN/SAC/TOR assuming CLE/DET/MIN trade happens (same as reported but Ridnour goes to DET and CLE's #32):
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...radeId=3hc9nqk
Many of the ideas overlap and I may have posted this elsewhere.
TOR: Casspi, Tolliver, Pekovic, #4 (Kanter), #5 (Walker)
SAC: Bargnani, Flynn, Webster, #8 (to go along with #7)
MIN: Calderon, Garcia, Thompson
Rationale:
Minnesota are young enough especially with Rubio coming. They get 2 veterans and one young player with 3 years experience under his belt who is better than anything they have at C. They solidify their bench and add maturity to locker room and still have the #20. With Kevin Love coming up for an extension they need to stop adding youth and start adding W's.
PG: Rubio, Calderon
SG: Johnson, Ellington
SF: Beasley, Garcia, Hayward
PF: Love, Randolph
C: Thompson, Milicic
Sacramento have a good core to build around in Evans and Cousins. Bargnani opens things up for both. They reportedly have interest in Flynn (source: HoopsWorld from Boston Globe - take it for what it is worth). They can then resign Thornton and reportedly want to resign Dalembert.
PG: Flynn, Udrih
SG: Evans, Thornton, Taylor
SF: Webster, Greene
PF: Bargnani, Hassan
C: Cousins, Dalembert
Toronto gets two more pieces to add to the core moving forward through the draft (Kanter and Walker) and possibly 3 as Casspi is only just turning 23 and, like JJ, has 2 years left on his rookie deal. Pekovic and Tolliver add depth to the front court with differing skill sets (Tolliver a stretch 4/5 and Pekovic a banger and a European one at that). They shed major salary as well and would have Barbosa, Bayless, and Tolliver coming off the books next year (about $12.8M).
PG: Bayless, Walker
SG: DD, Barbosa
SF: Casspi, JJ, Kleiza
PF: Davis, Amir, Tolliver
C: Kanter, Pekovic, Alabi
I doubt the lineup wins more than 28 games but it is certainly a nice core to build around and gives them another lottery pick to add what would hopefully be the missing piece or a bonafide future star. The bolded players could be considered core pieces moving forward and the italicized players being solid role/bench players.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...radeId=3hc9nqk
Many of the ideas overlap and I may have posted this elsewhere.
TOR: Casspi, Tolliver, Pekovic, #4 (Kanter), #5 (Walker)
SAC: Bargnani, Flynn, Webster, #8 (to go along with #7)
MIN: Calderon, Garcia, Thompson
Rationale:
Minnesota are young enough especially with Rubio coming. They get 2 veterans and one young player with 3 years experience under his belt who is better than anything they have at C. They solidify their bench and add maturity to locker room and still have the #20. With Kevin Love coming up for an extension they need to stop adding youth and start adding W's.
PG: Rubio, Calderon
SG: Johnson, Ellington
SF: Beasley, Garcia, Hayward
PF: Love, Randolph
C: Thompson, Milicic
Sacramento have a good core to build around in Evans and Cousins. Bargnani opens things up for both. They reportedly have interest in Flynn (source: HoopsWorld from Boston Globe - take it for what it is worth). They can then resign Thornton and reportedly want to resign Dalembert.
PG: Flynn, Udrih
SG: Evans, Thornton, Taylor
SF: Webster, Greene
PF: Bargnani, Hassan
C: Cousins, Dalembert
Toronto gets two more pieces to add to the core moving forward through the draft (Kanter and Walker) and possibly 3 as Casspi is only just turning 23 and, like JJ, has 2 years left on his rookie deal. Pekovic and Tolliver add depth to the front court with differing skill sets (Tolliver a stretch 4/5 and Pekovic a banger and a European one at that). They shed major salary as well and would have Barbosa, Bayless, and Tolliver coming off the books next year (about $12.8M).
PG: Bayless, Walker
SG: DD, Barbosa
SF: Casspi, JJ, Kleiza
PF: Davis, Amir, Tolliver
C: Kanter, Pekovic, Alabi
I doubt the lineup wins more than 28 games but it is certainly a nice core to build around and gives them another lottery pick to add what would hopefully be the missing piece or a bonafide future star. The bolded players could be considered core pieces moving forward and the italicized players being solid role/bench players.
Comment