Boko wrote:
A discussion of what might be an optimal model franchise doesn't hurt anyone, though. Right now, I see the range being from the 2004 Detroit Pistons of Ben Wallace (0 mega-stars, 0 super-stars, 1 star ...) to the 1986 Boston Celtics of Larry Bird (1 mega-star, 1 super-star, & 1 star ...).
In analyzing the distribution of those stars by position, where there were 3 stars, the Bulls won with 2 different PF/SF/SG combinations (Grant or Rodman, Pippen & Jordan). Hmm. That kills the argument that CB, LJ & DW should not be able to co-exist, doesn't it.
During the past 30 years ...
15 mega-stars have had PERS of 28+
17 super-stars of 21+, &
8 stars of 19+.
So, the most common championship team has 1 mega-star, 1 super-star & 6 role-players! Don't bet against the Heat next year ...
the Mavs won with 1 super-star & 7 role-players. No team like that has won 2 years in a row ...
and it'll be interesting to see if Dwight Howard & Kevin Love can find their side-kicks soon enough ...