View Poll Results: Who wold you rather have for a PG moving forward: Jose or Jennings?

Voters
46. You may not vote on this poll
  • Jose Calderon

    24 52.17%
  • Brandon Jennings

    22 47.83%
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 170

Thread: Brandon Jennings

  1. #121
    Raptors Republic Veteran NoPropsneeded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    5,802
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Miekenstien wrote: View Post
    sorry to nitpick but this is totally the opposite of ignoring and not responding.
    i meant if he decides to reply again.

  2. #122
    Raptors Republic Veteran NoPropsneeded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    5,802
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote knickz wrote: View Post
    jennings, rose, bayless and westbrook are all sg's forced to play pg...stop being a casual fan
    and don't ever call me a casual fan. I'm a die hard raptors fan, i almost cried after today's lost. When i close my eyes i still see that horrible moment when kobe hit that 3 and then the fade away. I will not sleep peacefully tonight

  3. #123
    Raptors Republic Starter IROR's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Ottawa/Toronto
    Posts
    262
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Jennings is already a great scorer at 22, and he is a game-breaker, he makes plays that few guys can make... he is one of the streakiest shooters in the league. He probably wouldn't make the Raptors any better this year, but going forward he's gotta be the obvious choice here. If he is available, he could help take the raptors to another level (He's had the bucks on his back all year). Love Caldy, but he won't win a championship with T.O.

  4. #124
    Raptors Republic Starter IROR's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Ottawa/Toronto
    Posts
    262
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote knickz wrote: View Post
    jose, brandon jennings is a sg forced to play pg. dude has a horrible fg % and makes horrible decisions
    he's 22, he's gonna turn the ball over. he is shooting a career high fg %. over 40 percent with the team he has is pretty good.

  5. #125
    Raptors Republic All-Star Balls of Steel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Richmond Hill, ON
    Posts
    1,970
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Brandon Jennings Seriously

    The Bucks are wiling to make Brandon Jennings available via trade "for the right price". Could the Raps really look at this seriously? What's it going to take, Ed Davis + a pick. He kind of intrigues me. That and the DeRozan connection could prove to be very interesting. I bet they're going to dangle Cap'n Jack with him. I think he could be an interesting piece to the PG puzzle of the future

    Source
    “The saving of our world from pending doom will come, not through the complacent adjustment of the conforming majority, but through the creative maladjustment of a nonconforming minority.” - Martin Luther King

  6. #126
    Super Moderator CalgaryRapsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,289
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Balls of Steel wrote: View Post
    The Bucks are wiling to make Brandon Jennings available via trade "for the right price". Could the Raps really look at this seriously? What's it going to take, Ed Davis + a pick. He kind of intrigues me. That and the DeRozan connection could prove to be very interesting. I bet they're going to dangle Cap'n Jack with him. I think he could be an interesting piece to the PG puzzle of the future

    Source
    It sounds like the Bucks are trying to include SJax in any Bogut trade. I wouldn't mind giving up Davis/Amir and/or Bayless, along with the 2013 or 2014 1st round pick, but I wouldn't want this year's lottery pick included.

    They could do Davis & a future 1st round pick for Jennings. Or they could even do Amir & Bayless & a future 1st round pick for SJax & Jennings. SJax's contract is expiring next year and he would be a good veteran SG off the bench, assuming Barbosa gets traded. It doesn't exactly fit with BC's stated goal of not taking salary back, but SJax would only be making a few million more than Amir would be next season, so it's not a bad price to pay for acquiring a PG-of-the-future type player.

    But what to do with Calderon? Interesting dilemma... could Calderon and Jennings co-exist for 1 season???

  7. #127
    Raptors Republic All-Star Miekenstien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,885
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    i don't want jackson. yucky yucky yucky. i am also not a big fan of jennings but if we are able to move jose for him then im good to go.

    i think the other players listed here are too valuable to our future to send for a shoot first point guard who often just sends up a 3 ball like white chocolate.

    it would be nice to see what casey could do with him but jennings has shown he does things his way. with what we are setting up i would much rather a pass first point guard. the pick and roll is a tried tested and true way to win a championship.

  8. #128
    Raptors Republic All-Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mississauga
    Posts
    1,570
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Miekenstien wrote: View Post
    i don't want jackson. yucky yucky yucky. i am also not a big fan of jennings but if we are able to move jose for him then im good to go.

    i think the other players listed here are too valuable to our future to send for a shoot first point guard who often just sends up a 3 ball like white chocolate.

    it would be nice to see what casey could do with him but jennings has shown he does things his way. with what we are setting up i would much rather a pass first point guard. the pick and roll is a tried tested and true way to win a championship.
    And1

  9. #129
    Raptors Republic Veteran NoPropsneeded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    5,802
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    trade barbosa and 2013 1st rounder for BJ

  10. #130
    Super Moderator CalgaryRapsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,289
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Miekenstien wrote: View Post
    i don't want jackson. yucky yucky yucky. i am also not a big fan of jennings but if we are able to move jose for him then im good to go.

    i think the other players listed here are too valuable to our future to send for a shoot first point guard who often just sends up a 3 ball like white chocolate.

    it would be nice to see what casey could do with him but jennings has shown he does things his way. with what we are setting up i would much rather a pass first point guard. the pick and roll is a tried tested and true way to win a championship.
    I wouldn't mind taking a flier on Jennings, so long as we only had to give up depth players (Amir/Davis and/or Bayless) and future picks. I agree that SJax isn't wanted, even as an expiring contract next season.

  11. #131
    Super Moderator ReubenJRD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, BC.
    Posts
    4,057
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote CalgaryRapsFan wrote: View Post
    I wouldn't mind taking a flier on Jennings, so long as we only had to give up depth players (Amir/Davis and/or Bayless) and future picks. I agree that SJax isn't wanted, even as an expiring contract next season.
    Jennings for Davis, Bayless and 2013 first rounder.

  12. #132
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    215
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I don't have anything against Jennings per se, but I don't think you give up next year's first round pick for him. Talent for talent. That pick could be valuable in this rebuilding stage, if indeed the Raps are going to be a potential lottery pick again next season. I don't think Jennings has shown himself to be valuable enough to alter the cap flexibility plans etc. by taking on a very bad SJ contract along with both of their perceived issues with coaches and fitting in to systems etc. Seems like a pretty big flyer.

  13. #133
    Super Moderator CalgaryRapsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,289
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote CT2010 wrote: View Post
    I don't have anything against Jennings per se, but I don't think you give up next year's first round pick for him. Talent for talent. That pick could be valuable in this rebuilding stage, if indeed the Raps are going to be a potential lottery pick again next season. I don't think Jennings has shown himself to be valuable enough to alter the cap flexibility plans etc. by taking on a very bad SJ contract along with both of their perceived issues with coaches and fitting in to systems etc. Seems like a pretty big flyer.
    If this Raptors team were to add Valanciunas, MKG/Barnes/Beal, Jennings, at least one free agent and possibly another late 1st round draft pick, while only losing Barbosa, Davis and Bayless, I think they would be a legit playoff team next season. I like the idea of a Davis & Bayless & 2013 1st round pick for Jennings.

    The lineup could look something like this:

    C: Valanciunas, Gray
    PF: Bargnani, Amir, Kleiza
    SF: Barnes/MKG, JJ, Kleiza
    SG: DeRozan, Batum?!?!?!, Forbes
    PG: Jennings, Calderon, Kabongo??

    That looks like it has the potential to be a playoff team in the Eastern Conference next season, meaning the 2013 1st round pick wouldn't be that bad to give up along with Davis & Bayless for Jennings. Giving up that much for Jennings, would mean that I wouldn't want to take on a bad contract (ie: SJax) as well.

  14. #134
    Super Moderator ReubenJRD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, BC.
    Posts
    4,057
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote CalgaryRapsFan wrote: View Post
    If this Raptors team were to add Valanciunas, MKG/Barnes/Beal, Jennings, at least one free agent and possibly another late 1st round draft pick, while only losing Barbosa, Davis and Bayless, I think they would be a legit playoff team next season. I like the idea of a Davis & Bayless & 2013 1st round pick for Jennings.

    The lineup could look something like this:

    C: Valanciunas, Gray
    PF: Bargnani, Amir, Kleiza
    SF: Barnes/MKG, JJ, Kleiza
    SG: DeRozan, Batum?!?!?!, Forbes
    PG: Jennings, Calderon, Kabongo??

    That looks like it has the potential to be a playoff team in the Eastern Conference next season, meaning the 2013 1st round pick wouldn't be that bad to give up along with Davis & Bayless for Jennings. Giving up that much for Jennings, would mean that I wouldn't want to take on a bad contract (ie: SJax) as well.
    I like it, only problem is, Batum's original position is the small forward, so technically, we would have a log jam at the three. If we are planning on doing this, than the plan is sign Batum as it is, BUT draft Beal or Lamb. Because JJ is rising and answering the call of many, and seems like a guy who can be our future small forward. BUT, I also don't want to give up or pass on Gilchrist, (unless taken before our pick). BC will have a lot of decisions this summer!

    So lineup would be.

    PG: Jennings, Calderon, (Kabongo)
    SG: Derozan, (Beal/Lamb), Forbes
    SF: Batum, JJ, Kleiza
    PF: Bargnani, Johnson
    C: Valanciunas, Gray.

    But I would rather see something like...

    PG: Jennings, Calderon, Kabongo
    SG: Derozan, Free agent, Forbes
    SF: Gilchrist, JJ, Kleiza
    PF: Bargnani, Johnson
    C: Valanciunas, Gray

    EDIT* Just wanna point out, our bench looks like our current starting lineup without Bargnani.
    Last edited by ReubenJRD; Tue Mar 13th, 2012 at 02:12 AM.

  15. #135
    Raptors Republic All-Star ezz_bee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kigali, Rwanda
    Posts
    1,681
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote RaptorReuben wrote: View Post
    I like it, only problem is, Batum's original position is the small forward, so technically, we would have a log jam at the three. If we are planning on doing this, than the plan is sign Batum as it is, BUT draft Beal or Lamb. Because JJ is rising and answering the call of many, and seems like a guy who can be our future small forward. BUT, I also don't want to give up or pass on Gilchrist, (unless taken before our pick). BC will have a lot of decisions this summer!

    So lineup would be.

    PG: Jennings, Calderon, (Kabongo)
    SG: Derozan, (Beal/Lamb), Forbes
    SF: Batum, JJ, Kleiza
    PF: Bargnani, Johnson
    C: Valanciunas, Gray.

    But I would rather see something like...

    PG: Jennings, Calderon, Kabongo
    SG: Derozan, Free agent, Forbes
    SF: Gilchrist, JJ, Kleiza
    PF: Bargnani, Johnson
    C: Valanciunas, Gray

    EDIT* Just wanna point out, our bench looks like our current starting lineup without Bargnani.

    I'm okay with moving amir or davis + Bayless + 2013 1st rounder for the "pg of the future", but i'm not sold on jennings. To be fair, I haven't seen a lot of his game, but what I have seen is a very similar game to bayless. I do think that jennings is a definite upgrade over bayless, but i'm not sure i'd want him over calderon for the next two seasons.

    The main reason? JV. I watched A LOT of JV game tape since he's been drafted, not highlights but full games. His defense won't be an issue coming into the league (IMO).

    It'll be his offensive that will be slow to develop. I do think he has some tools offensively: He's a great free throw shooter so i think he could develop an elbow or baseline jumper, but right now, they aren't really part of his arsenal. He is most effective rolling to the rim (either out of the pick and role, or on a straight cut), catching the ball above his head, keeping it there for a step or two, and finishing at the rim. He needs a point guard who is REALLY good at the P'n'R, and passing into the paint in order to be effective offensively.

    If the sample we got from bargs is an indicator of how he'll play for the rest of his contract then I want him getting the ball in his hands a lot as well. I'd still like derozan to get a lot of set plays run for him as well.

    I wouldn't be angry if he jennings trade went done as described above, but I don't think it'll lead to the kind of ball movement this team is going to need to be playoff calibre offensively.
    "We only have one rule on this team. What is that rule? E.L.E. That's right's, E.L.E, and what does E.L.E. stand for? EVERYBODY LOVE EVERYBODY. Right there up on the wall, because this isn't just a basketball team, this is a lifestyle. ~ Jackie Moon

  16. #136
    Raptors Republic Veteran white men can't jump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,888
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    No Jennings for me please. I agree with much of what's been said, good and bad, but fall on the side of those who think Jennings may not be anything more than a selfish PG. Connections (to Demar) are never good enough reasons to acquire somebody. We need, as most teams do, a pass first PG. No team has ever won a championship with a shoot-first PG (that I can recall). The closest is the Pistons, but Thomas, while being a scorer, was hardly a total ball hog. Jennings shortcomings I think are showcased by how the Bucks tried to build around him and Bogut. You have players like Jax, Dunleavy, Delfino, Livingston...all players with decent passing skill. In addition, some of those guys replaced black holes like Maggette and Salmons. Clearly with them and Jennings the team didn't move the ball around more and they were hoping maybe some more team oriented guys would help. This is not something I want. I don't want the team to have to try so hard to hide weaknesses. We all know that doesn't work and the only real solution is to have the player step up(hopefully Bargs from now on) or get rid of him. Maybe a team can win with a score first PG, but even then it would have to be a real star, like Rose (and you could argue he's a decent distributor who's still getting better) and Westbrook (not a natural PG, so a bit unfair to lay the same criticism on him).

  17. #137
    Raptors Republic Veteran Nilanka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,975
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I think Jennings has a lot of potential. I'd hope Colangelo is thinking of a way to make a deal happen. The kid's just 22 years old. He has plenty of room to mature.

    Raps fans tend to assume that there are just 2 types of point guards (i.e. "pass first" like Calderon, or "shoot first" like Bayless), but Jennings seems like a happy median. He can light it up when he wants to, and is still a good distributor. Let's not underestimate the Casey-factor either. With a little encouraging guidance, there's no reason why Jennings can't become more selective with his shots.

    As for Jonas's transition next year, Jennings is perfectly capable of running a pick 'n' roll.

    Taking on Jackson's contract doesn't concern me either. As an expiring contract next year, there's a good chance he's traded before next year's deadline.
    "I don't lie. I willfully participate in a campaign of misinformation." - Fox Mulder

  18. #138
    Raptors Republic All-Star RaptorsFan4Life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,753
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I'd much rather we don't give up anything for him and go after Dragic in the summer. IMO He's pretty much the same as Jennings but with better court vision. Much better for the future if we don't give up first rounders/depth.

    Jennings IMO is on the shoot happy side like Bayless.

  19. #139
    Administrator Apollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    12,049
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    FYI, I've merged the three Brandon Jennings threads into one super thread.

    They're all essentially covering the same idea.

  20. #140
    Raptors Republic Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    5,059
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote RaptorsFan4Life wrote: View Post
    I'd much rather we don't give up anything for him and go after Dragic in the summer. IMO He's pretty much the same as Jennings but with better court vision. Much better for the future if we don't give up first rounders/depth.

    Jennings IMO is on the shoot happy side like Bayless.
    Agree. I am a bit of a Dragic fan and always remeber when he took over the Suns team when Nash was hurt a couple of years ago. I think he is a better PG and far more balanced than Jennings. I have to admit I am a bit "scared" of Jennings general demeanor eg. he has already said he is scouting big market teams! And he is still on his rookie contract. I am thru putting up with shit like that. Dragic as a ufa (not give up a first and others) is a much better proposition.

Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •