Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 36

Thread: Do we really need a 3?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Super Moderator thead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,294
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Do we really need a 3?

    I've been watching most of this season and I keep seeing on the boards here that our real need is a 3...our real need is a 3...we need MKG/Barnes/an enema etc...

    This is essentially James Johnson's second season. He didn't get a chance in Chicago and he played half a season here.

    He came into this season with a broken jump shot no training camp and a compressed schedule.

    He has been pretty damn impressive. He is working a ton with Tom Sterner and seems to have fixed his shot.

    This team with the following minor changes is a play off team...

    1.) Calderon gets his own shot more - pulls defenders out to him frees up lanes
    2.) DeRozan develops a steady 3 - pulls defenders out to him - blow by
    3.) Johnson takes low risk in rhythm jump shots/cleans up the glass and shuts his man down
    4.) Bargnani keeps doing what he is doing - when not injured
    5.) Valanciunas adds to the front court depth cleans the boards and erases mistakes on the defensive end allowing Johnson and DeRozan to play more aggressive D on the wings.

    Kleiza is great off the bench - Davis is great in the 3rd big man role - Gray is fine in the backup big garbage 10 minutes a game role. I really think the only decisions that need to be made are backup PG and 6th man role. I guess what I am saying is our current record is nowhere near indicative of where we are in the rebuilding process. This current core with the current coach + JV = first round play off team next season. Could we still make some changes? Absolutely, but I don't buy we are as bad off as our record says we are.

  2. #2
    Raptors Republic Veteran ceez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,143
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I like JJ a lot and he's obviously the best defensive wing we have but to say he shuts people down is silly

  3. #3
    Raptors Republic All-Star hateslosing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    New Brunswick
    Posts
    1,524
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote thead wrote: View Post
    I've been watching most of this season and I keep seeing on the boards here that our real need is a 3...our real need is a 3...we need MKG/Barnes/an enema etc...
    I agree with this premise. The three, while definitely not a strong position for us, is hardly our weakest. James Johnson has been playing well this year, improving by leaps and bounds on both ends of the floor. Kleiza is among our best benchers and is a very good piece. Could we do better? Of course but the question is, where are we worse? The two is an easy answer: with Leandro likely leaving after this year, we have no back up and there is a strong argument that Derozen is not the future at that position. Then we look at the 5. What if Val doesn't play well in his first year. Euro bigs can take a long time and expecting him to come in and be amazing may be foolish. Johnson is a little small to play the 5 as we saw this year so who starts there if Jonas doesn't work out as well as we hope? Calderon is good, but does anyone see Bayless as this teams starter?

    I'd say the three is in no worse shape than any other position. When the draft comes you take the best player available. It's just good business.
    "When Life gives you lemons, you clone those Lemons to make super lemons!"
    -Scudworth

  4. #4
    Raptors Republic Hall of Famer mcHAPPY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    17,776
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Yes we need a three.

    The problem the Raptors have, in my opinion, is guys are starting who are bench players:

    Amir - bench
    Gray - bench
    JJ - bench
    Kleiza - bench
    LotteryBall - buried

    Then you have a player like Calderon, who is very good, but would likely be a backup on half the teams in the league. DeMar while given the opportunity has yet to show he deserves the opportunity to be a full time starter - even with a 3 point shot his handle is dreadful and his defense is porous.

    The talent level on this team is not good enough to compete with the starting talent on the majority of the teams in the league (which is why they are routinely down by 15 after the first quarter).

    As for next season, JV has big expectations for me in the future but he will still be a rookie next year. He should not be counted on to be a difference maker to reach the playoffs as a rookie.



    So back to James Johnson, yes, we need a three... and possibly a 1 and 2.... and maybe a 5.

  5. #5
    Raptors Republic Starter jimmie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    491
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Toronto needs a starting 2, 1 and 3 in that order, in my opinion.

    Derozan has miles to go to be an effective 2, but could get there. I'm not sold, but am hoping for continued improvement for the rest of this season. And Colangelo suggesting he might be a better 3 than 2 is the definition of damning with faint praise. Sure, he might be a better 3 than 2, but that doesn't mean he'd make an effective 3. His iffy defense and rebounding rate don't support that idea. I know he can score at a starting SG level, but he needs a consistent 3-pt shot and he really needs to improve his man defense, or else he might be better served as a scorer off the bench.

    Calderon is great, for now. But he'll probably make a better backup in 3 years when it matters. Bayless is not the answer.

    James Johnson has already shown more improvement in 30+ games this year than anyone else on the team (barring Bargs' small sample). He's got 15-5-5 low-end potential, IMO, and can provide above-average defense at 3 positions. Is he a long-term starter? Maybe not, but he's certainly adequate while waiting for an elite 3 to come along. I'd be 100% comfortable starting him next year.

    5: Val, Gray, another vet
    4: Bargs, Amir (trade Ed Davis)
    3: JJ, Kleiza
    2: Derozan (let Barbosa, Bayless walk if not traded this season)
    1: Calderon (if not traded this season)

    That's not a bad start for next season. Draft pick + two players acquired in trade and free agency, bench filler. Another development season, but one where making the playoffs is not inconceivable depending on who is brought in via trade/FA. Voila.
    Definition of Statistics: The science of producing unreliable facts from reliable figures.

  6. #6
    Raptors Republic Hall of Famer mcHAPPY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    17,776
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote jimmie wrote: View Post
    Toronto needs a starting 2, 1 and 3 in that order, in my opinion.

    Derozan has miles to go to be an effective 2, but could get there. I'm not sold, but am hoping for continued improvement for the rest of this season. And Colangelo suggesting he might be a better 3 than 2 is the definition of damning with faint praise. Sure, he might be a better 3 than 2, but that doesn't mean he'd make an effective 3. His iffy defense and rebounding rate don't support that idea. I know he can score at a starting SG level, but he needs a consistent 3-pt shot and he really needs to improve his man defense, or else he might be better served as a scorer off the bench.

    Calderon is great, for now. But he'll probably make a better backup in 3 years when it matters. Bayless is not the answer.

    James Johnson has already shown more improvement in 30+ games this year than anyone else on the team (barring Bargs' small sample). He's got 15-5-5 low-end potential, IMO, and can provide above-average defense at 3 positions. Is he a long-term starter? Maybe not, but he's certainly adequate while waiting for an elite 3 to come along. I'd be 100% comfortable starting him next year.

    5: Val, Gray, another vet
    4: Bargs, Amir (trade Ed Davis)
    3: JJ, Kleiza
    2: Derozan (let Barbosa, Bayless walk if not traded this season)
    1: Calderon (if not traded this season)

    That's not a bad start for next season. Draft pick + two players acquired in trade and free agency, bench filler. Another development season, but one where making the playoffs is not inconceivable depending on who is brought in via trade/FA. Voila.
    Actually, this got me thinking.

    I could go with JJ starting but only if DeRozan is not. There would have to be a SG who can do everything DeMar can do offensively and what he can't do as well. Better defensively would also go a loooooong way to helping the cause.

  7. #7
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    414
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    From 82games.com, here's the net PER by position for the Raps:

    PG: +0.7
    SG: -4.0
    SF: -4.1
    PF: -0.5
    C: -3.4

    I'd say wings in general are the issue. I'm not suggesting PER is a perfect measure of how effective the team is by position, but this is kind of telling. Right now they're getting absolutely nothing from the 2/3 spots offensively, and that's a huge problem.

  8. #8
    Raptors Republic Starter jimmie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    491
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Matt52 wrote: View Post
    Actually, this got me thinking.

    I could go with JJ starting but only if DeRozan is not. There would have to be a SG who can do everything DeMar can do offensively and what he can't do as well. Better defensively would also go a loooooong way to helping the cause.
    That's what I'm hoping for. Either Demar gets better or moves to the bench in favour of a guy like Mayo, Rudy Fernandez, Eric Gordon (not likely) or a draft pick in Beals or Lamb (although starting a rookie over Derozan would likely mean he's out in Toronto anyway), or a trade for a guy like Monta Ellis, Anthony Morrow. Or a guy like JRich, as a temporary measure while waiting for a Beal/Lamb to develop...
    Definition of Statistics: The science of producing unreliable facts from reliable figures.

  9. #9
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    240
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote jimmie wrote: View Post

    5: Val, Gray, another vet
    4: Bargs, Amir (trade Ed Davis)
    3: JJ, Kleiza
    2: Derozan (let Barbosa, Bayless walk if not traded this season)
    1: Calderon (if not traded this season)

    That's not a bad start for next season. Draft pick + two players acquired in trade and free agency, bench filler. Another development season, but one where making the playoffs is not inconceivable depending on who is brought in via trade/FA. Voila.
    Glad I'm not the only one thinking this way. I know Ed Davis CAN provide some good stuff once in awhile. But it always seems to me like he's not really giving it his all, or not really wanting to be in TO. Even if that's not the case, I think Amir is more able to provide what we need on a nightly basis as a backup to Bargs.

    As for Barbosa, he might as well find his place on a more 'compete-now' type team and leave room for some young guys to fight it out for the 2. Bayless hasn't proven staying power on a team as a starting PG, so unless he's willing to take a small contract, ship him out...

  10. #10
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    798
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Yeah, JJ's play is starting to make me think that rather than locking in on SF, you go BPA between SF, SG, and PG.
    You only go with PF if it's Anthony Davis, and the only way you draft a C is if it's a really strange scenario, like most of the good SFs and SGs are off the board and Drummond is still available. With no PGs currently projected to be in the top 10 (possibly not in the top 15), that means the shortlist right now is MKG/Barnes/Miller/Lamb/Beal (no particular order).

    That said, if there's an opportunity to upgrade two of these positions at the same time (trading down, trading away a player for a second pick, trading the pick away for a good package), then I think it deserves serious consideration.

  11. #11
    Raptors Republic Rookie
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    85
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    As has been covered here on this board... JJ actually produces far better at the 4. So does Linas. So really, the Raptors don`t even have a 3. They have four back-up power forwards and one starting PF.

  12. #12
    Raptors Republic Rookie
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Think about it this way, who do you want starting in 2 years?

    PG: No current raptor
    SG: No current raptor
    SF: No current raptor
    PF: Andrea Bargnani (or Anthony Davis if we land him)
    C: Jonas Valanciunas

    First off the bench (if you only consider current raptors to be resigned)

    PG: Jose Calderon
    SG: Demar Derozan (I prefer to see him traded)
    SF: James Johnson or Kleiza
    PF: James Johnson or Kleiza or Amir/Ed (one of them needs to be traded, and both if we land Anthony davis)
    C: No current raptor

    Reality is, our current starting lineup is a good bench in the future. Yes we need a 3 but that's not all we need. Take the best available player in the draft and use Barbosa/Amir/Ed/Calderon/DD or combinations there of to get a second lottery pick.

    I like JJ as a bench player who can cover the 3 and 4 depending on matchups.
    I like Amir but he's at best a bench PF with good defence and hustle. I'm not attached to him.
    Ed Davis is good but he's not the answer as a starter. He's similar to Amir with more upside.
    DD's biggest liability is his FG% 3Pt% and the fact he's a poor rebounder and has zero court vision. Not the answer.
    Calderon is great as a fifth option on the team; but he can't be first or second. Awesome player. His biggest weakness is his athletic ability. He can't keep guards in front of him and he can't consistently penetrate in the paint for layups or kick-outs.
    Kleiza can get you an offensive spark off the bench at either 3 or 4. I'm not attached to him.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    41
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote EasyE wrote: View Post
    Think about it this way, who do you want starting in 2 years?

    PG: No current raptor
    SG: No current raptor
    SF: No current raptor
    PF: Andrea Bargnani (or Anthony Davis if we land him)
    C: Jonas Valanciunas
    It's sad but so true. We're building up the likes of Ed and Demar who are not what we make them out to be.

    I may go with Drummond instead of Davis as we'll probably need someone who can bang with the likes of a Zach.R, Bynum, etc and also do some physical punishing on the both ends of the court.

  14. #14
    Raptors Republic All-Star Miekenstien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,762
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote EasyE wrote: View Post
    Think about it this way, who do you want starting in 2 years?

    PG: No current raptor
    SG: No current raptor
    SF: No current raptor
    PF: Andrea Bargnani (or Anthony Davis if we land him)
    C: Jonas Valanciunas
    i would trade down to 2 or 3 if we won the lottery. this team needs a sf. i think that drafting and keeping davis just restarts the who we need where unless bargs gets moved for a 3. id rather bargs with mkg or barnes with big V in the middle.


    and i think our needs are 3 *2* 1. we still have jose for a year, it would be great to change him out but not at the expense of lesser talent now at the position. 10 million after he is done next year is enough money to sign a player of great quality.

    i asterixed 2 because i think that demar can and will prove he can play there. with bargs and "hypothetically" barnes on the floor there would of a lot of room on the floor if demar can dribble.

  15. #15
    Raptors Republic All-Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,083
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Nicolas Batum

  16. #16
    Raptors Republic Starter draftedraptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    599
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote sleepz wrote: View Post
    Nicolas Batum
    JJ, Kleiza/Weems or even DeMar are good options but Batum is the answer.

  17. #17
    Raptors Republic All-Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,083
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote draftedraptor wrote: View Post
    JJ, Kleiza/Weems or even DeMar are good options but Batum is the answer.
    Ideally he would be the answer. I think he's a restricted FA which makes things difficult in acquiring him but you never know.

  18. #18
    Raptors Republic Superstar Chr1s1anL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Posts
    3,577
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Wow, does nobody remember Demars is 22 years old and it's his third year. Can you name anybody other than Blake Griffin that is having a great year from the 09 draft? When he was drafted they it would take about 4 years. Well he has have one more year.

  19. #19
    Raptors Republic All-Star stretch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,772
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Chr1s1anL wrote: View Post
    Wow, does nobody remember Demars is 22 years old and it's his third year. Can you name anybody other than Blake Griffin that is having a great year from the 09 draft? When he was drafted they it would take about 4 years. Well he has have one more year.
    I guess that depends on your interpretation of "great". James Harden comes to mind. Steph Curry and Rubio are playing great imo.

  20. #20
    Raptors Republic Veteran NoPropsneeded's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    5,543
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    people are gonna hate so just let them. DeMar is going to be the starter for years to come like it or not. People gotta learn to deal with it cause he sure as hell isn't going to get traded.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •