I would have to agree. Although the second round picks could be used as a nice trade asset, a part of me likes the idea of seeing what we could get with them. Whether it be a cheap player with upside to fill out a roster, or someone to hold the rights to for a few years and see what happens (Spurs are masterful at this).
I have brought up this name a few times, but from what I have seen I would love for the Raptors to take a flier on Scott Machod, PG from Iona. A little undersized, but incredibly quick. Was second in the NCAA to Marshall in Assists and Assists/Turnovers. He runs the fast break well and is good on the pic n' roll as well. This combined with increasing his shooting percentages every year (senior this year) to me shows a guy with a good work ethic.
Odds are he would not amount to much, but there is certainly some potential there.
he is too much like jose and doesn't have the athleticism we need a the PG. He need an athletic PG that can penetrate and defend and also set up teammates.
You really think he isn't athletic enough to play PG, Beal only has one "glaring" weakness is his somewhat shaky handle, he is known for his shooting and silky smooth athleticism and Beal has no problem finishing around the paint. The idea of having Beal as a PG is not bad at all, he can easily create for his teammates in spurts. However, I think in order to fully utilize Beal's maximum effectiveness putting another shot creating guard with him in the backcourt will allow Beal in some catch and shoot situations, his most effective shooting style. If we do draft Beal and he shows the game we expect I believe we should target players like Tyreke Evans, Evan Turner, Jrue Holiday, Tony Wroten, Iggy.
But what I love about Beal is I believe he can play both guard spots, essentially I believe he is the perfect combo guard. A Beal and Tyreke/Turner has potential to allow Casey to play a very dangerous backcourt.
i don't much like the idea of a back court filled with one on one players, who can create for others, because they tend to use it as a last result. i will point to evans current team, the kings for an example of players who can create for others if they want but end up playing one on one the whole game. with the kings a lot is do to immaturity and selfishness but if we have a very young back court we could be just bringing that problem to our team.
i really want some continuity from year to year to start happening on the raptors soon. i would never jump ship but the past few years we are only ever excited at the beginning to see how all the "new" players on the team will work before we ship them out for another new crop.
i also wouldn't have beal play the 1. never want the term "shaky handle" associated with a pg. i said earlier before he started really becoming the man in phili that i wanted turner because i hoped we could poach him for cheap from a team that wasn't using him at all. would still love him even over holiday and probably most young guards to play the point for us he is a great talent, but again would have to start from the bench behind a player like jose.
The thing is, the backcourt of Beal and Evans/Turner/Holiday is to create for one another, Beal is unselfish to a fault, Jrue Holiday has shown us to be a defensive passing PG with SG height, Turner was basically a match made in heaven for Beal, and I believe if Casey can get Bargnani to play like he was for his first 13 games, I believe he can turn Evans around.
However this is still just speculation if we even draft Beal. I believe with this draft class, drafting BPA will be our best choice.
Westbrook and Holiday were both SG's coming out of university.
With that said, I'm not sure if Beal can play PG though. If I had to pick an answer I'd say no.
Holiday and Beal have shown the ability to create for themselves and others though. Guys weren't hitting shots versus Toronto but Holiday was finding guys in position to score. I was really watching him the entire game when he was on the floor.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)