Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ESPN Mock Draft 4.0: Raptors select Damian Lillard
Collapse
X
-
ceez wrote: View Posti have a feeling Harkless is going to shoot up draft boards come workouts like Paul George. he's certainly intriguing. very raw, though.
Comment
-
ceez wrote: View Posti have a feeling Harkless is going to shoot up draft boards come workouts like Paul George. he's certainly intriguing. very raw, though.“Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are.”
― John Wooden
Comment
-
-
RaptorsFan4Life wrote: View Post@Chr1st1anL
Comment
-
Chr1s1anL wrote: View PostIt seem like a lot of you are just finding out about http://swishscout.com/ lol
BTW They have us talking Lamb. I think it'd be the better choice as well. We need someone who can play really good D as well as stretch the floor.
Comment
-
He's the right pick
I'm looking at the draft and it doesn't have a ton of value at the top. Drummond and PJ are not proven. Barnes hasn't impressed me at all. He doesn't shoot a good percentage and can't create his own shot. I think they're all potentially busts. Lillard has shown the amount of skill he has, and shoots a good percentage. He doesn't play in the best league, but he can get it done. He has good court vision and is a heads up player that has a quick first step. He isn't in a position to defer, and has to take a majority of the shots... which tells me, he better at offense then the league dictates due to defensive schemes to shut him down. He may also be a better floor general then expected given the chance.
Comment
-
RaptorsFan4Life wrote: View PostYa... lol.
BTW They have us talking Lamb. I think it'd be the better choice as well. We need someone who can play really good D as well as stretch the floor.
Lamb would be a great pick up.
7-foot wingspan!!!! Oh yeah, and he can shoot and dribble.
Comment
-
speedbag wrote: View PostI'm looking at the draft and it doesn't have a ton of value at the top. Drummond and PJ are not proven. Barnes hasn't impressed me at all. He doesn't shoot a good percentage and can't create his own shot. I think they're all potentially busts. Lillard has shown the amount of skill he has, and shoots a good percentage. He doesn't play in the best league, but he can get it done. He has good court vision and is a heads up player that has a quick first step. He isn't in a position to defer, and has to take a majority of the shots... which tells me, he better at offense then the league dictates due to defensive schemes to shut him down. He may also be a better floor general then expected given the chance.“Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are.”
― John Wooden
Comment
-
The Coach wrote: View PostWatching Boston dominate the Hawks tonight got me thinking that more teams might be going to a pg (rondo), pg/sg (bradley), sf, pf, c lineup. It makes more sense when you think about the rule changes and the challenge it is to stop quick ball handlers. Does this make a guy like lillard even more attractive... or is he just another bayless?
Comment
-
If you want a fast PG just start Bayless he is pretty damn fast and strong. I think one of the main reasons you guys don't like him as a pg on our team is because we have no ball handlers. Our offense is too PG dominated, its always jose dribbling around looking for an open man. Like look at OKC westbrook doesn't even dribble the ball up sometimes because almost all their wing players can handle the rock and create offense. If Demar could do that and we had a SF who could do that then starting bayless would be no problem, am i right?
Comment
-
Matt52 wrote: View PostIf you are looking for that type of player, just keep Bayless and put him in the starting lineup at the 2 guard. Draft Lamb at 8 for your Harden-esque, first guard off the bench (or vice versa in time).“Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are.”
― John Wooden
Comment
Comment