Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 47

Thread: Bynum?

  1. #21
    Super Moderator CalgaryRapsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,285
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Nilanka wrote: View Post
    We have a better chance of landing Juwan Howard
    haha I hope I made it abundantly clear that I gave it a 0.003% chance of actually happening! It just popped into my head as I was reading the article and just had that "what if" thought... lol

  2. #22
    Raptors Republic Veteran Nilanka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,957
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    You did make it clear...I was just buggin' ya.

    You raise some legit points regarding Howard. But as a sports fan, what he's done to the Magic franchise has left a very sour taste in my mouth (I feel especially bad for SVG).

    As great of a talent Howard is, I can't say with certainty that I'd be happy to see him in Toronto (speaking purely about his character).
    "I don't lie. I willfully participate in a campaign of misinformation." - Fox Mulder

  3. #23
    Raptors Republic All-Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,099
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote tbihis wrote: View Post
    If Bynum is willing to bolt LA, should the Raps be interested?

    What do you guys think?

    Bynum for Calderon and Bargnani?
    In a heartbeart. JV can learn on the job or play him at the 4 until you feel comfortable he can handle NBA 5's.

    I beleive Bynum is in the player option year of his contract (I could be wrong)? If so, not much risk involved.

    The only issue with this is the Lakers have NO interest in giving up Bynum for Bargnani and Calderon. They would be considered a laughing stock for making such a poor trade

  4. #24
    Raptors Republic All-Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,099
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Matt52 wrote: View Post
    I would not give up any assets for Bynum.

    He is a great player but he is also a great pain in the bottom.
    Maybe, but with one year left on a hefty expiring deal, and you get rid of Bargnani's contract you don't see the benefits in this? The only thing is I would have liked Jose to resign on a more cap friendly deal after his contract expires.

  5. #25
    Raptors Republic Superstar planetmars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,376
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote sleepz wrote: View Post
    In a heartbeart. JV can learn on the job or play him at the 4 until you feel comfortable he can handle NBA 5's.

    I beleive Bynum is in the player option year of his contract (I could be wrong)? If so, not much risk involved.

    The only issue with this is the Lakers have NO interest in giving up Bynum for Bargnani and Calderon. They would be considered a laughing stock for making such a poor trade
    I'm not a huge Bargnani fan, but if we traded Calderon and Bargnani for Bynum, and Bynum leaves after one year, you have basically given Bargnani away for nothing. I think Bargnani could fetch a lot more than 1 year of Bynum's services.

  6. #26
    Raptors Republic All-Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,099
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote planetmars wrote: View Post
    I'm not a huge Bargnani fan, but if we traded Calderon and Bargnani for Bynum, and Bynum leaves after one year, you have basically given Bargnani away for nothing. I think Bargnani could fetch a lot more than 1 year of Bynum's services.
    Thats the selling point for me. It's win-win.

    What is Bargnani worth around the league anyways? No one knows and I'm beginning to think it's because no one offers anything of significance to even banter about it. Bynum is an all-star (with poor medical history mind you) while Andrea is not (and starting to develop some injury conerns of his own).

    If Bynum works out you have arguably a top 2 centre (he's much better than Howard offensively) playing on your team. He doesn't work, you have sign and trade options and in the worse case scenario he up and leaves you have cap space and the rebuild continues the way it should, but you got Bargnani's contract officially off the books, which I think is a positive going forward for this team.

    We need to take chances with talents that are franchise changers and if they don't work (we know Bynum is immature at this point of his career), clean the slate and continue trying to acquire game-changing talent. The best player in that fictional trade is by far Bynum. I'll take my chances with the better player all the time.

  7. #27
    Administrator Apollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    11,989
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote planetmars wrote: View Post
    I'm not a huge Bargnani fan, but if we traded Calderon and Bargnani for Bynum, and Bynum leaves after one year, you have basically given Bargnani away for nothing. I think Bargnani could fetch a lot more than 1 year of Bynum's services.
    Unless the goal is to dump cap you should never trade for an expiring contract. I would suspect a contract extension would be required first and it's a pretty common thing in this age.

  8. #28
    Raptors Republic All-Star slaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    2,095
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I would trade any combination of players on this team for Bynum. Hell, I would trade all of the players on this team for Bynum (I'm only slightly exaggerating, too). A 20-12 centre who distorts the game for any of the detritus on this roster? Kuphcak would have me at hello...

    Point's moot because the Raptors don't have the assets to make the trade (Hey Mitch, do you really want Dwight Howard? I've Jose Calderon, Demar Derozan and Andrea Bargnani! Hello, Mitch, hello? Ah, we got cut off...). Even if the Lakers went crazy and did that deal with Toronto, what makes anyone think that Bynum would sign here long term?

  9. #29
    Raptors Republic Rookie Scummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I totally agree, FAs keep criticizing Canada for its taxes and weather, but what they dont get is that when they play in NY or LA, they get a state, when you play for Toronto, you get a country!
    But it's not their country, and that's the way they probably look at it.

    Howard and Bynum are not going to be in a Raps jersey. Valanciunas is their C of the near future, and I think they'll keep the seat warm with Gray in the meantime. They have other needs that need more immediate attention.

  10. #30
    Administrator Apollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    11,989
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote slaw wrote: View Post
    I would trade any combination of players on this team for Bynum. Hell, I would trade all of the players on this team for Bynum (I'm only slightly exaggerating, too). A 20-12 centre who distorts the game for any of the detritus on this roster? Kuphcak would have me at hello...

    Point's moot because the Raptors don't have the assets to make the trade (Hey Mitch, do you really want Dwight Howard? I've Jose Calderon, Demar Derozan and Andrea Bargnani! Hello, Mitch, hello? Ah, we got cut off...). Even if the Lakers went crazy and did that deal with Toronto, what makes anyone think that Bynum would sign here long term?
    Bynum is the second best center in the league. People question his attitude but he publicly states he wants to play where he is most wanted. Unlike the top center in the league who states the opposite. Yet every Raptors fan would jump on board the idea of D12 coming here long term.

    Bynum's teammates like him.
    Howard's teammates don't like him.

  11. #31
    Raptors Republic All-Star Soft Euro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Utrecht, The Netherlands (Yes, that's Europe!)
    Posts
    1,920
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Regardless of my opinion of Calderon and Bargnani (which I think are the two best players on our team) I'd welcome either Bynum or Howard (if they sign first) in a trade for them without having to think more than a few seconds. Both Bynum and Howard have been judged too harshly on their character in my opinion. I might be going a bit off topic, but considering some people brought it up in their reasoning why not to trade for either...

    Bynum has to play with a completely selfish former mvp who somehow hasn't done a Duncan yet and thinks the offense should go through him ('this is what I do') and a coach who supports this style of play. Many times this season, and especially so in the fourth quarter, Bryant (and his followers in the line-up) totally ignored a Bynum who had established position on the low block. And many times, after having been ignored a couple of times, Bynum just stopped wrestling to get position; what's the use? On many an occassion possessions ended with Bryant taking an ill-advised shot and choosing not to go for good offensive execution. Now, that guy even continues to publicly criticise his teammates. Yes, he also does criticise himself, but only that he should make more of those bad shots, not that he should defer more to others. After about 300 bad shots this season by Bryant, Bynum took some threes showing that if he made a bad choice the coach would be critical (and not the 300 by the other guy) and also saying "remember me? I'm in a bad position now, but I can shoot bad shots as well you know, how about giving me the ball when I'm in a good position?"

    Howard, on the other hand, is criticised for his trade demands and asking for another coach. In my opinion, management didn't do too well in Orlando, with handing out and dealing for bad contracts making it impossible to surround Howard with a solid supporting cast (who could have grown with him); almost all players they got after getting Howard were past their prime and only got worse. Terrible management. With Van Gundy, Howard had a coach who has had only one modus for a big part of their time together, scream, scream, scream. If I had a boss like that, I'd probably flip one day and punch him in the face. For all his acclaimed x's and o's knowledge, that would just not be acceptable for me. Besides: the story on his 'demands' of firing Van Gundy is that he didn't go talk with the owners (or gm, I don't remember) and demand a trade, but that they asked him in and asked what his view was on the team and organization. Saying that he'd like another coach if he does so, seems pretty reasonable to me if they ask you.

    So ... in short: yes please, count me in.

  12. #32
    Raptors Republic Starter SuperRaptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    475
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote sleepz wrote: View Post
    In a heartbeart. JV can learn on the job or play him at the 4 until you feel comfortable he can handle NBA 5's.

    I beleive Bynum is in the player option year of his contract (I could be wrong)? If so, not much risk involved.

    The only issue with this is the Lakers have NO interest in giving up Bynum for Bargnani and Calderon. They would be considered a laughing stock for making such a poor trade
    I would never give up both Calderon and Bargnani (two legit assets) for a guy who has never been able to stay healthy for a full NBA season.

    Don't get me wrong I would love to have Andrew Bynum, but not for Calderon AND Bargnani, no chance. Maybe just calderon, and a pick.

  13. #33
    Raptors Republic Starter SuperRaptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    475
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I forgot to mention Bynum's Contract totally over pays him.

  14. #34
    Raptors Republic Rookie Tortacular's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Saskatoon, SK.
    Posts
    110
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Andrew Bynum? No thanks.

    Sure he's a great player when he feels like it. But he's been in the league 7 years. He's not a kid anymore.

    I'd rather not pay franchise player money to a guy who I'm never sure is going to show up night in and night out.
    You can find me on Twitter.

  15. #35
    Administrator Apollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    11,989
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Right. Seven years in the league and only 24 years old.

  16. #36
    Raptors Republic Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    5,007
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I think Bynum is just waiting to bust out offensively. Re: he likes to play when he wants to is unfair....I have noticed his frequent playing with injury. As someone else said he is being stifled offensively with Kobe & Pau & even Metta getting the majority of the shots.

  17. #37
    Raptors Republic Starter
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    400
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Howard to Lakers, Calderone to Lakers, Bynum to Raptors, Bargnani and pick to Orlando.

  18. #38
    Raptors Republic All-Star Sig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,095
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote j bean wrote: View Post
    Howard to Lakers, Calderone to Lakers, Bynum to Raptors, Bargnani and pick to Orlando.
    Orlando would NEVER do that. They could get much better deals elsewhere.

  19. #39
    Super Moderator thead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,983
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I thought I turned down this idea already...why is this thread still going?

  20. #40
    Raptors Republic Hall of Famer mcHAPPY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    19,220
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Via HoopsHype.com:

    Perk was asked what the difference is between defending Tim Duncan and Andrew Bynum. “Well, Duncan is smart,” he said. DailyThunder.com
    Classic.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •