drunkmunky wrote:
I'm going to break down my thoughts on each player, offensively, and defensively. This is going to be quite a long post but if you have the patience to read all of this, know that I wrote it with sincere appreciation for your thoughts. If you're a small little child with no patience, I suggest you read the parts I put in bold, or that I highlighted in red.
Offense.
Group A
Fields, Kleiza, Ross, Pietrus, Lucas III.
Those 5 guys were supposed to be our 3-pt threats that spread the floor,
Landry Fields
Any team scout can identify that he has no shot right now. Anytime he is on the floor, there is no offensive threat from him no matter how much he runs. He is not the one who attracts the defense in order to spread the floor, and it ends up being a 4 v 5 offensive situation whenever he is on the court. Since he has been back, we've got our fingers crossed that he can push the ball up the court, get offensive rebounds and he is doing the best that he can with what he's got. IMO. He's performed as a better point guard than JL III with the limited time that he's been on the floor.
Kleiza & Pietrus
They are done.
Ross
A work-in-progress Rookie that was supposed to learn and backup the rest of Group A. He has essentially taken the place of Fields, or what was the bare minimum expectation of what Fields should have been when we acquired him
Lucas III
He is an effective player in this group. He is in this group because he is a shoot first player which is really what this team needed, considering the 4 players I mentioned above, are mildly ineffective, or non-existent.
Conclusion?
We have 2 effective players out of originally intended 5. Ross and Fields count as 1 player, John Lucas counts as the other.
How much of the poor performance from Group A is Brian Colangelo responsible for?
Pietrus
Kleiza
John Lucas III
Group B
Demar, Gay, Bargnani, Anderson, Lowry & Telfair to run the floor.
Demar has gotten better throughout this entire season. His assists are up. His rebounds are about the same as they have always been. Even though his FG % isn't as high as it should be w/ the introduction of Rudy Gay and this so called "Shots will be easier because the floor will be spread", his efforts to attack the post have resulted in his growth as one of the better FT % shooters in the league. The expectation that he is supposed to develop as a 3-pt. threat is silly, but he needs to make them occasionally. The biggest thing that he needs to work on is his ball handling. It's horrible.
Gay is the superstar that we needed. He's Demar #2 but he is almost the 'psychopath' that Bargnani was SUPPOSED to be as a CLOSER. One of the problems is that he doesn't trust this team at the moment, and whenever he tries to take everything on by himself, the team goes into Isolation plays, and it's him vs. the world. If hes HOT, he gets them in, if hes not, we think he sucks. He needs to integrate into the rest of the team.
Bargnani He hasn't had any offense this season, so I can't really say anything good. So I won't.
Anderson
has filled the role of Bargnani. He is an inconsistent streaky shooter with the ability to drive, shoot the 2, shoot the 3, spread the floor, and his dribble penetration is, imo, the best on the team. I HATE the Alan Anderson quarter in the 4th, but the truth is, Bargnani was supposed to do the same thing.
Lowry
is an average point guard. He trusts Demar and Gay and he relies on them to be 'ON', and he is good at feeding the ball to other players when they are hot. He is not one of those inspirational leaders that dictate the pace of the game and energizes the team. The team needs to be energized and he will feed the ball to whomever is most effective. His own personal shot selection is the same as John Lucas III.
Telfair
has great ball handling skills. He pushes the floor really well. He doesn't know the team well enough and I haven't seen him play well enough to see consistent offensive capability. His shot is below John Lucas III.
Conclusion?
We have 4 effective players out of the original 6. Demar and Gay have their own game. Anderson is the Bargnani replacement, and Lowry and Telfair count as 1 player because they do not have enough of an offensive capability to stand on their own.
How much of the poor performance from Group A is Brian Colangelo responsible for?
Lowry
Telfair
Bargnani
Group C
Johnson, Valanciunas, Acy, Grey to scrap and fight in the post.
Johnson
is the most consistent player on the team. He is highly underrated, endlessly abused, quick hands, scraps, gets offensive rebounds. Gets double teamed ALL the team with defensive bigger guys on him so it is difficult to pass him the ball, especially since his ankle is fudged and his mobility is limited.
Valanciunas
has amazing natural capabilities with a very high shooting percentage and he is learning how to post up. He gets tunnel vision during offensive plays and he gets a bit lost, so feeding him the ball can be difficult.
Acy
doesn't really have offense so I can't say much. Just scrap and put backs.
Gray
doesn't have any offensive capability. He has a very low shooting percentage and he is there for defensive purposes to function as a body in the post. He doesn't touch the ball enough to be an effective offensive threat because he doesn't know what to do with it half the time.
Conclusion?
We have 2 effective players out of the original 4. Johnson and Valanciunas got game. Acy COULD? develop game. Aaron Gray was a needed back up center.
How much of the poor performance from Group A is Brian Colangelo responsible for?
Aaron Gray
Offensive Conclusion
I mentioned a total of 15 players, of which 7 players have not sufficiently done their offensive jobs. With the problems in the paint, you can see why Lowry doesn't throw the ball into the post often, but the development of Johnson and JV as a duo will change that.
I'll have my defensive comments after lunch.