Kyle Lowry (Note: I discarded his rookie year, in which he missed all
but 10 games due to injury)
Age PTS REB AST TOV FG% 3P% FT% PER
21 13.6 4.3 5.1 2.2 .432 .257 .698 14.3
22 12.5 4.1 5.9 2.5 .435 .255 .801 14.4
23 13.5 5.4 6.7 2.5 .397 .272 .827 15.5
24 14.2 4.3 7.0 2.2 .426 .376 .765 16.5
***Addition by Matt52 and only included starting #'s from last year due to return from injury/illness***
25 15.9 5.3 7.2 2.8 .418 .388 .865 18.89*
*PER includes 9 games after comeback where he did not play great back from injury and not starting so PER should be higher.
1. Steve Nash (breakout season in bold)
Age PTS REB AST TOV FG% 3P% FT% PER
22 11.2 3.3 7.3 3.3 .423 .418 .824 10.8
23 14.9 3.5 5.7 2.1 .459 .415 .860 15.6
24 8.9 3.2 6.2 2.4 .363 .374 .826 10.9
25 11.3 2.8 6.4 2.4 .477 .403 .882 13.5
26 16.5 3.4 7.7 3.1 .487 .406 .895 19.6
Where the Comparison Work: Like Lowry, Nash spent the
early part of his career as a backup. When given a starting job in Dallas,
he grabbed the bull by the horns and never looked back, eventually becoming a
superstar.
Where the Comparison Fails: A huge part of what has made
Nash such an effective player is his shooting ability, which he demonstrated
from Day 1. Though I believe Lowry will continue to improve in this
department, I doubt he'll ever reach Nash's level.
2. Gary Payton (breakout season in bold)
Age PTS REB AST TOV FG% 3P% FT% PER
22 9.4 4.3 8.5 2.9 .450 .077 .711 13.2
23 10.8 4.2 7.1 2.5 .451 .130 .669 13.1
24 15.7 4.0 5.6 2.1 .494 .206 .770 17.0
25 16.9 3.4 6.2 2.2 .504 .278 .595 17.8
26 20.2 3.4 7.0 2.4 .509 .302 .716 21.3
Where the Comparison Works: Unlike Nash and Lowry, Payton
was more or less a starter from day one, and a defensive ace from
the start. However, he didn't start posting superstar-level numbers
until his age-26 season. In addition, one similarity is that Payton
game into the league with no 3PT range to speak of, and eventually
became a more than respectable shooter.
Where the Comparison Fails: Payton's assist numbers were
likely stifled in his early years do to the fact that he played alongside
another great distributor in Nate McMillan. He also possessed superior
size and athleticism to Lowry (and everyone else listed here). And
though Lowry's a plus defender, if he was going to become the dominant
defensive force that Payton was, we'd probably know by now.
3. John Stockton (breakout season in bold)
Age PTS REB AST TOV FG% 3P% FT% PER
22 11.1 2.5 10.0 3.6 .471 .182 .736 13.3
23 11.7 3.3 11.3 3.1 .489 .133 .839 17.0
24 12.6 2.9 13.0 3.2 .499 .179 .782 19.0
25 15.3 3.0 14.3 3.3 .574 .358 .840 23.2
Where the Comparison Works: It doesn't, not really. Because
of his inability to effectively shoot the three ball early in his career, the
Jazz made Stockton a backup for the first three seasons of his
career, and his per-36 minute numbers suggest that this was a mistake.
You can only wonder how many assists he would have collected if he
had started from day one. I will say that like Payton, Stockton came into
the league with virtually no 3PT shot to speak of, and became one of
the best shooters ever. So perhaps there's a remote chance that Lowry
could turn into an elite shooter, in which case I do think he'd become a
perennial all-star.
Where the Comparison Fails: See above.
4. Mo Cheeks (breakout season in bold)
Age PTS REB AST TOV FG% 3P% FT% PER
22 10.2 3.8 6.4 2.9 .510 .000 .721 12.6
23 12.3 3.8 7.6 3.0 .540 .444 .779 15.9
24 11.4 3.7 8.3 2.6 .534 .375 .787 16.4
25 12.7 3.6 9.6 2.7 .521 .273 .777 18.3
Where the Comparison Works: I think this may be Lowry's most
reasonable comp. Mo Cheeks was a hard-nosed, scrappy 6'1" PG who
made four All-Star Teams and was four times named to the All-Defense 1st
Team. In his age-25 breakout season he ranked third in the NBA in assists
per game and had a low turnover rate, and the next year he made his first
All-Star team. I could easily see Lowry putting up that kind of campaign
in 2011-12 and having a similar career path.
Where the Comparison Fails: I actually think Lowry's ceiling
is greater than becoming Mo Cheeks 2.0. Though he likely won't be the
defender Mo was, he can certainly hold his own in that department,
and seems to have greater potential as a scorer if his jumper continues
to improve. If Kyle can become the distributor that Cheeks was, I think
he'll eventually surpass him. It should be noted that Mo was generally
the third or fourth best player on some stacked Sixers teams in the '80s.
While I don't think Kyle can be a number one option on a championship
level squad, if he continues to improve I could certainly see him as
the second best player on a very good team.
http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=212619