can i use this for my avatar euro?
I hate threads like this....it's a pointless excercise that gets us no where
I say we trade BARGNANI to Dallas for Vince Carter and a 2014 first round pick.. Make Vince play the SF position
i hope its not granger either. the guy is 30 and coming off a major injury. and its not like he's a 25/5/5 guy thats worth a gamble.
lets just put to rest the whole Rudy Gay wet dream. Memphis is not going to break its core this season. maybe theyll consider trading him if they dont get past the 1st round but that is a long shot as well.
I'd trade trade for granger if they want to take bargnani...he's worth the risk and at worst Bargs is gone.
The Nets need offense desperately, i wonder if they would take bargs off our hands for a pick?
I think someone takes him off our hands come trade deadline, I mean he can be somewhat useful off the bench.
pg, sg, sf, pf, c 84/85 magic johnson 23.5 ppg on .561 shooting 8 rpg 16.2 apg 1.9 stl
pg 14/15 steph curry 23.8 ppg .443 from 3 7.7 apg 2 stl .638 ts%
pf 73/74 bob mcAdoo 30.6 ppg .547 shooting 15.1 rpg 1.2 stl 3.3 blk 43 min
Harrison may yet turn into an almost all-star. Blake can drop the 3. Jordan gives hustle, and is a nice jump shooter.
Bargs is gone.
Just saying, this is a more realistic trade, closer to the type of thing we can expect.
He's not particularily quick or strong, but his size alone is a huge asset to the Pacer's defense.
Every trade is realistic and can be adjusted to work financially, but you have to look at the benefits and the willingness of teams to participate in that trade.
What will the Raptors do with Hill and Blake? Dont they already have an Amir and Lucas? Youre essentially trading a floor spacer in Bargnani for another lane clogger in Hill. I dont mind Blake, but not at the expense of acquiring Hill. You seem more like a Lakers fan than a Raptor. Youre giving them Bargnani for practically peanuts.
Of course Barnes has the potential to turn into an all-star, thats why this trade is, for a lack of a better term, dumb. Why would GS trade an early 20s rookie who has massive potential for an aging PG? Coz they dont have enough starter-calibre PGs in Curry, Jack?
Sorry if the post sounds sarcastic, but trade proposals like this just make me wanna bang my head on the wall. Actually, i think i just did.
My biggest concern is getting our first round pick back. We are not a playoff team. I think older, "elite" SFs are much less valuable to us than picks/youth at this point.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)