He is by far our best offensive player off the bench. Why the hell aren't we running the offense through him? This makes even less sense when the offence is struggling and he's getting like 2-4 shots a game at most.
He is by far our best offensive player off the bench. Why the hell aren't we running the offense through him? This makes even less sense when the offence is struggling and he's getting like 2-4 shots a game at most.
Haven't you heard? Alan Anderson is the second coming of Michael Jordan. He's already not getting enough shots as is. Nobody else should ever shoot it when Alan's on the court.
he's inefficient, and is going to hurt the team if his shot isn't falling that day.
plus we might be stuck with big pasta until february 2014, so he needs to figure out how to be an effective 3rd/4th option.
Here's the post I was to refer to:
Figure out how to be an effective 3rd/4th option??! lol what? Bargs is not going to rebound and his defensive skills aren't exactly all star calibur. This was apparent a looong time ago. Anyone who follows this team know that his biggest upside is his scoring. He's a tall body than can stretch the floor and is an above avarage spot up shooter. So what do you suggest? How the hell can he be an effective player shooting 2-4 shots per game?
Gay isn't exactly helping the team either by taking 20 shots a game when regardless if he's extremely cold. I think Bargs should get the same treatment. He's better than pretty much everyone else on the bench when it comes to offense, he should getting minimum 10 shots a game.
Bargs & JL3 should not come in unless we have a lead. They always lose it and the starters come back. But in a situation when you are in a close game or behind....leave them off. Until Andrea PUNANEE learn to run the pick & roll, rebound or even use all 6 fouls....let him ride pine.
"Championships are what we live for, now lets go win them."Tim Leiweke
If you have forgotten 43.7% career shooting average from a 7ft PF is hardly anything I would hang a debate on.
I am also not judging Bargnani on 12 games since Rudy Gay trade. There are 418 other games in his 'illustrious' career to come to an opinion.
Bargnani is a one-dimensional, inefficient scorer and that is why the offense is not being run through him.... on any line.
"Championships are what we live for, now lets go win them."Tim Leiweke
I dont think its a terrible idea.
But only because it means Anderson takes less shots (lower FG%)
The Baltic Beast is unstoppable!
Over the span of a few seasons, almost all of us are bound to make some faulty projections.
I do think that bargs should be getting way more touches on Offense in the second unit. I think we should run plays through him IN THE POST!
EDIT: and his rebounding abilities have absolutely nothing to do with it. In fact if all he's capable of giving you is offense, why don't you Leverage it!
"We only have one rule on this team. What is that rule? E.L.E. That's right's, E.L.E, and what does E.L.E. stand for? EVERYBODY LOVE EVERYBODY. Right there up on the wall, because this isn't just a basketball team, this is a lifestyle. ~ Jackie Moon
casey. thats why
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)