I agree that the waiver wire can add some good pieces to a team. But I don't think that it turn a team with a bad initial dynasty draft into a contender.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
RR NBA Dynasty League - S1
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
koncept wrote: View PostI agree that the waiver wire can add some good pieces to a team. But I don't think that it turn a team with a bad initial dynasty draft into a contender.
Comment
-
skywalker wrote: View PostTRADE:
Pau Gasol and his 3 year contract (2 years after this year) + my top draft pick for your 3 year contract player that can help me make a push into the playoffs!! Any takers??
If anyone has a better offer for him, better hurry.
Comment
-
I propose a slight rule change to be made in the off-season. Call me out if I'm totally out of line on this, please.
I am of the opinion, that in the current set up, those managers who are at the 40-year-cap actually hold a slight advantage over Managers who are not, by being able to sign and drop players off the waiver wire as they please with no consequence to their cap situation.
I believe those Managers who are NOT at the Cap limit, should have the option of signing the player to a deal for the remainder of the season that does not count against their cap, by waiving their right to restricted free-agency of that player.
And we could streamline the book keeping a bit as well with this, as any player who is declared to be signed in this regard will simpy be left off the books altogether; similar to what the masterful Soft Euros doing now with those players signed to Capped out teams.
And then any player not on a teams books is in the pool at the end of the year.
What do you guys think?
Comment
-
joey_hesketh wrote: View PostI propose a slight rule change to be made in the off-season. Call me out if I'm totally out of line on this, please.
I am of the opinion, that in the current set up, those managers who are at the 40-year-cap actually hold a slight advantage over Managers who are not, by being able to sign and drop players off the waiver wire as they please with no consequence to their cap situation.
I believe those Managers who are NOT at the Cap limit, should have the option of signing the player to a deal for the remainder of the season that does not count against their cap, by waiving their right to restricted free-agency of that player.
And we could streamline the book keeping a bit as well with this, as any player who is declared to be signed in this regard will simpy be left off the books altogether; similar to what the masterful Soft Euros doing now with those players signed to Capped out teams.
And then any player not on a teams books is in the pool at the end of the year.
What do you guys think?
Comment
-
joey_hesketh wrote: View PostI propose a slight rule change to be made in the off-season. Call me out if I'm totally out of line on this, please.
I am of the opinion, that in the current set up, those managers who are at the 40-year-cap actually hold a slight advantage over Managers who are not, by being able to sign and drop players off the waiver wire as they please with no consequence to their cap situation.
I believe those Managers who are NOT at the Cap limit, should have the option of signing the player to a deal for the remainder of the season that does not count against their cap, by waiving their right to restricted free-agency of that player.
And we could streamline the book keeping a bit as well with this, as any player who is declared to be signed in this regard will simpy be left off the books altogether; similar to what the masterful Soft Euros doing now with those players signed to Capped out teams.
And then any player not on a teams books is in the pool at the end of the year.
What do you guys think?
advantage then goes to team under on completing trades and puts no consequence in place for adding and dropping a gazillion times to make up extra games.
I am happy to roll with majority but prefer to keep as same.
Comment
-
Matt52 wrote: View Postadvantage then goes to team under on completing trades and puts no consequence in place for adding and dropping a gazillion times to make up extra games.
But right now the advantage lies with the Capped out team who can add and drop a gazillion times, and thats not right, in my opinion.Last edited by Joey; Sun Mar 10, 2013, 01:30 AM.
Comment
-
joey_hesketh wrote: View PostAll the more incentive to keep yourself under the cap.
But right now the advantage lies with the Capped out team who can add and drop a gazillion times, and thats not right, in my opinion.
If the goal is to make this as close to the "real" thing as possible, then you need to have any player added count towards the cap. In the NBA even 10 day contracts count towards the cap and luxury tax calculations.
Also, as the rules currently stand, you can only extend 2 guys currently on your roster for the following season. Once you have 2 guys you want to keep and extend, this rule also adds another benefit to a team under the cap.
I think this rule takes away from the intended purpose of running a dynasty league. Every action needs to have implications.
Comment
-
Matt52 wrote: View PostAlso, as the rules currently stand, you can only extend 2 guys currently on your roster for the following season. Once you have 2 guys you want to keep and extend, this rule also adds another benefit to a team under the cap
The rule states "At the end of the year you are allowed to two sign players on your roster to an extension for as many years as you want provided you remain under cap. This decision must be made prior to the draft."
I'm reading 'under the cap' in terms of my 2013-14 cap.. is that right? OR is the rule saying you can only extend 2 players if you have 'current' cap space. If it is the latter, only drizz, joey, and appollo are under the cap.
Comment
-
skywalker wrote: View PostI'm probably misunderstanding this, but can't a team that's over the cap now, still extend 2 players currently on the roster for the following season in the off season?
The rule states "At the end of the year you are allowed to two sign players on your roster to an extension for as many years as you want provided you remain under cap. This decision must be made prior to the draft."
I'm reading 'under the cap' in terms of my 2013-14 cap.. is that right? OR is the rule saying you can only extend 2 players if you have 'current' cap space. If it is the latter, only drizz, joey, and appollo are under the cap.
Comment
Comment