Craig wrote:
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Debate settled......
Collapse
X
-
Craig wrote: View Postthats fine. he will excel, he's better than you give him credit for I think Matty
Comment
-
ball4life wrote: View PostHes definitely a good player, no doubt about it... but i doubt he belongs in this team now that we have a "direction"... so I think we should cash in on his records so far before frustration builds up
I will tell you why I think he does.
1) He's very young
2) He has improved every year since being drafted.
3) He's tough, durable.
4) Good team guy, coachable and likes toronto
5) He's currently one of the better SG's in the East
6) He is a family man.
7) He is a team player, unselfish and liked by his peers.
Thats just a starter. But fire away, why does Demar Derozan not "fit" with Toronto.
Comment
-
1) not really that young
2) He hasn't really improved
3) durable yes, tough no
4) not really seeing the team guy/coachable...maybe be due to Casey
5) Ok
6) Nothing to do with basketball...most players have families
7) again I really don't see this but it may be the coaching
If this team is looking to build a contender he needs to be either a) an elite 3pt shooter and a defender or b) an elite playmaker
Comment
-
Nosike wrote: View PostNo point in trading DD“The saving of our world from pending doom will come, not through the complacent adjustment of the conforming majority, but through the creative maladjustment of a nonconforming minority.” - Martin Luther King
Comment
-
OldSkoolCool wrote: View Post1) not really that young
2) He hasn't really improved
3) durable yes, tough no
4) not really seeing the team guy/coachable...maybe be due to Casey
5) Ok
6) Nothing to do with basketball...most players have families
7) again I really don't see this but it may be the coaching
If this team is looking to build a contender he needs to be either a) an elite 3pt shooter and a defender or b) an elite playmaker
Comment
-
Craig wrote: View PostThis ain't boxing.
he doesn't wear that record himself
5 years in the league and he is a big part of his team.... he defo should be accountable for that record during his time here...
and all that other stuff you mentioned earlier in your post is likeable in a player but they do not necessarily transform into Ws.Last edited by ball4life; Sun Dec 8, 2013, 10:54 PM.
Comment
-
LMAO. Tankers worst nightmare tonight. And we don't even have those 'serviceable' bench pieces from SAC yet. Are we tanking, or not? Was Rudy massive addition by subtraction? We will go on a Ewing Theory playoff run? Will Vasquez revitalize JV and Amir? The debate just went up a few notches. lol.
Comment
-
OldSkoolCool wrote: View Postokay. Ditto
Difference of opinion but I will side with DD's 125-205 W-L record speaking for me
It's a team sport, and DeRozan isn't a #1 option on a title contender, I don't think anyone on this whole forum would disagree with that. What he IS, is a very capable secondary or tertiary scorer that is among the best players in the league at his position. If you get blown away in an offer and it helps the team? Sure trade him. But you don't look to ship him out just because he's playing better than normal, he's not some trash that we have to get rid of to move forward.
Kyrie Irving and John Wall have pretty bad won-loss records as well, so does a guy like Cousins. Guess their teams should start trying to ship them out the second they have a string of good games right?
Comment
Comment