The problem could happen if it is all we run, then it becomes predictable (like what happened with Calderon)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do we run too many screens?
Collapse
X
-
peanutwoozle wrote: View PostThe problem could happen if it is all we run, then it becomes predictable (like what happened with Calderon)
The PNR is the hardest thing for a defence to guard against because there are a plethora of options from it (drive, pass to roll, reverse dribble drive, step back, pick n pop, pick n post on switch, etc). Add in a second screen or other movement designed to get a defensive rotation and possible mismatch and the defence may know how a play initiates (pick at the high post) but doesn't know where it is going to end up. Since the options are all available, if the D takes one away, it usually leaves another option open.Heir, Prince of Cambridge
If you see KeonClark in the wasteland, please share your food and water with him.
Comment
-
Axel wrote: View PostHow is it predictable?
The PNR is the hardest thing for a defence to guard against because there are a plethora of options from it (drive, pass to roll, reverse dribble drive, step back, pick n pop, pick n post on switch, etc). Add in a second screen or other movement designed to get a defensive rotation and possible mismatch and the defence may know how a play initiates (pick at the high post) but doesn't know where it is going to end up. Since the options are all available, if the D takes one away, it usually leaves another option open.
Comment
-
peanutwoozle wrote: View PostI mean if we always try to get the same guy in the same spot over and over, teams will read into it.
Overplay the pass (to deny them from getting the ball) and you are susceptible to a simple backdoor cut, which would put the D in a worse position.
Pressure them once they receive the ball and they can simply drive by their defender, which would put the D in a worse position.
Deny the screener from getting position is holding and a foul.
Just don't see any possible way that this could be a problem for the team. There is a reason teams don't put too much pressure on ball handlers at the top of the key unless it is a guy with poor handles or it is an elite defender.Heir, Prince of Cambridge
If you see KeonClark in the wasteland, please share your food and water with him.
Comment
-
Axel wrote: View PostSo your fear is that teams will suddenly try to deny Demar/Lowry from getting the ball at the top of the key? How would they do that?
Overplay the pass (to deny them from getting the ball) and you are susceptible to a simple backdoor cut, which would put the D in a worse position.
Pressure them once they receive the ball and they can simply drive by their defender, which would put the D in a worse position.
Deny the screener from getting position is holding and a foul.
Just don't see any possible way that this could be a problem for the team. There is a reason teams don't put too much pressure on ball handlers at the top of the key unless it is a guy with poor handles or it is an elite defender.
Comment
-
Nilanka wrote: View PostWhat I meant was that despite Calderon's "predictable" PNRs, defenses weren't able to stop him from running the offense.Heir, Prince of Cambridge
If you see KeonClark in the wasteland, please share your food and water with him.
Comment
-
-
stooley wrote: View Postand terrible, terrible defense.
For the record, I was very much in the trade Jose camp.Heir, Prince of Cambridge
If you see KeonClark in the wasteland, please share your food and water with him.
Comment
-
Axel wrote: View PostNot relevant to the point though. We're discussing PNR offence, and Jose was great at it. Which shows that no matter how predictable the set-up is, it's very difficult to defend.
For the record, I was very much in the trade Jose camp."Bruno?
Heh, if he is in the D-league still in a few years I will be surprised.
He's terrible."
-Superjudge, 7/23
Hope you're wrong.
Comment
Comment