| Boston Celtics | 112 | Final | 96 | Toronto Raptors |
![]() A | B. Ingram35 MIN, 24 PTS, 4 REB, 7 AST, 0 STL, 10-17 FG, 3-7 3FG, 1-2 FT, 1 BLK, 3 TO, 8 +/- His jumper remains fire. He’s shooting more triples recently now that they’re falling, and it’s really giving teeth to Toronto’s offensive possessions, even lame-duck ones. (There were a LOT of lame-duck ones.) He really understood his offensive advantages over every defender. Great job getting to his spots, and even mixed in some nice passes with a clean floater early on. His defence wasn’t anything to write home about, especially when he switched onto Boston’s smalls. But he was far from Toronto’s only issue there. And he cleaned that up in the second, playing strong weak-corner defence to break up a pass that should have been an easy bucket. | ||||||||
![]() D- | I. Quickley32 MIN, 3 PTS, 4 REB, 7 AST, 1 STL, 1-12 FG, 1-7 3FG, 0-0 FT, 1 BLK, 1 TO, 4 +/- A desperately poor performance. Some imperfect choices, and he missed his looks, too. When he checked in midway through the second quarter, I liked his intent much better. He was more engaged on defence, cracked back to the glass more readily, and gave up the ball earlier. He won a rebound in transition that he had to fight for. Blocked a Pritchard triple from behind. So, you know, he was better at the small stuff. But the big stuff still wasn’t there. He didn’t create much of anything for himself or others, which ultimately is a huge problem from a team’s starting point guard. | ||||||||
![]() C- | S. Barnes33 MIN, 12 PTS, 9 REB, 6 AST, 0 STL, 5-15 FG, 1-5 3FG, 1-1 FT, 2 BLK, 4 TO, -10 +/- His passing was exquisite for long stretches, but the scoring really wasn’t at any point. I liked his defensive work on Payton Pritchard in a switch, letting his length do the work for him, not falling for fakes, and closing the gap instantly when Pritchard picked up his dribble. But offensively early, he couldn’t lift his bench group, missing his jumpers and finishes, and trying to get too cute with his interior passing. | ||||||||
![]() B | S. Mamukelashvili30 MIN, 24 PTS, 5 REB, 1 AST, 0 STL, 9-13 FG, 6-9 3FG, 0-0 FT, 1 BLK, 2 TO, -6 +/- Just a fantastic scoring game. He showed the value of a spacing big. Got open early as Toronto’s forwards worked inside. Hit a huge number of shots. But he just can’t eat glass on his own, and Boston’s bigs fought for tons of offensive rebounds with Mamukelashvili in the game. The defence was not very good with him anchoring it. | ||||||||
![]() C+ | O. Agbaji27 MIN, 6 PTS, 3 REB, 1 AST, 0 STL, 1-5 FG, 0-3 3FG, 4-4 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, 8 +/- He didn’t put much in the box score, and his jumper was wayward, but he got off the ball fast as lightning, which meant he didn’t hurt the offence with his presence. It really helps when you make quick decisions, as long as they don’t lead to turnovers. He won some fights on the glass. And his defence on White was quite solid. Still. Hitting his triples would have helped! | ||||||||
![]() C- | G. Dick13 MIN, 5 PTS, 0 REB, 1 AST, 1 STL, 2-4 FG, 0-2 3FG, 1-1 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, -21 +/- The 3-point shot wasn’t there, and that outweighs everything else. How many times have you heard this? He’s gotta shoot. Still, he didn’t offer nothing. A fearless drive and reverse and-1 in the third quarter. Great work fighting on the glass early on, stealing an offensive rebound he had no business getting to. Hit a short jumper after a stampede cut. Defensively, he was poor. | ||||||||
![]() C- | J. Shead24 MIN, 6 PTS, 3 REB, 2 AST, 0 STL, 2-5 FG, 2-4 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 1 TO, -15 +/- Wasn’t finding ways to lead the offence in the first quarter. Missed his shots and even got stripped open court by a big. He misthrew a fairly easy transition look to Mamukelashvili, ahead of everyone, in the second quarter. Hit a triple after Boston doubled the post in the second, then another right away on a handoff with Barnes. But ultimately, his units didn’t win minutes, and he was a big part of that. | ||||||||
![]() D+ | J. Walter15 MIN, 7 PTS, 0 REB, 0 AST, 0 STL, 2-6 FG, 2-5 3FG, 1-2 FT, 1 BLK, 0 TO, -29 +/- His jumpers were off early, even though they weren’t particularly contested, and Toronto fell behind. Hit a few in the middle quarters, each of which Toronto desperately needed, and Toronto pulled into the lead. A coincidence? Well, yeah, kind of. His defence wasn’t what it usually is, and he gave nothing inside the arc. Didn’t help on the glass whatsoever, and he fouled. | ||||||||
![]() Inc | J. Battle6 MIN, 0 PTS, 2 REB, 1 AST, 0 STL, 0-1 FG, 0-1 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, 1 +/- I had a whole thing typed out about my frustrations in his minutes living and dying by the results of his first few jumpers, but then he got another stint after missing in his first, and he responded with a make. Not enough minutes to make much of a determination, but with Toronto’s offence so stilted (especially without Ingram), I really would have liked to have seen more Battle. | ||||||||
![]() B+ | C. Murray-Boyles23 MIN, 9 PTS, 6 REB, 4 AST, 0 STL, 4-8 FG, 1-3 3FG, 0-1 FT, 1 BLK, 1 TO, -18 +/- A strong game despite his plus-minus numbers, which weren’t his fault. Offensive rebounding. He finished well throughout the game, and threw the right pass to a cutting Agbaji from the nail when given a high-post touch. Hit an open above-the-break triple that Ingram created with his off-screen gravity. His defence was quite solid, even though some Celtics made some tough shots in his face, and he did have some mistakes. But that doesn’t detract from what was a great game. | ||||||||
![]() Inc | G. Temple2 MIN, 0 PTS, 1 REB, 0 AST, 0 STL, 0-1 FG, 0-1 3FG, 0-0 FT, 0 BLK, 0 TO, -2 +/- Garbage time. | ||||||||
![]() D | Darko Rajakovic Toronto just hasn’t been consistent in terms of effort and execution since RJ Barrett got hurt. Sure, the skill level is obviously down, and the team is missing a number of his skills, especially his driving. The team is also missing Jakob Poeltl. But that doesn’t excuse getting killed on the glass by a team also missing key contributors. It doesn’t excuse Toronto’s offensive lethargy. Yes, it’s the players on the floor. But Toronto found answers for much of the game and then went away from them. | ||||||||
Things We Saw
- An awful end to the first quarter for Toronto. They lost intentionality on offence and effort on defence, getting beat to loose balls. And it wasn’t Boston’s stars beating them over that three- or four-minute stretch, but the B Team. Boston started killing the Raptors on the glass. Toronto seemed to let its offensive troubles impact its defence, which turned what would have just been a drought into a big run for the other team. Rough.
- But then the Raptors did the exact opposite to Boston to end the second quarter, playing far more physically, and adding much more verve to its offensive actions. And THEN Toronto lost that verve later on. Rough. Once you find what works in a game, you generally expect a team to stick with it.
- Murray-Boyles and Barnes both got beat with simple back screens on inbounds plays, leading to uncontested Boston layups on BLOB sets. Bad.
- Something positive: When Ingram plays like this off screens, he’s such an insane weapon. He doesn’t need a lot of touches or dribbles, and he blends his scoring punch into the fabric of Toronto’s offensive possessions. Basically Darko Rajakovic’s lab-designed wing scorer, doing so much of his work with his legs, before he gets the ball.
Your next read: Me, on the All-Star performances of Brandon Ingram and Scottie Barnes
Scottie Barnes and Brandon Ingram are dominating. This is the vision of their tandem stardom, each filling in the holes in the other’s game. They work together, and separately, both proving to be powerful beyond measure. They thrive, every time one of the them touches the ball a boon to the Toronto Raptors’ offence. These are elite players, two of the best in the NBA. This is what a good partnership looks like:
Barnes blocks a shot at the rim, discos his way down the floor for a layup. He leaks out in transition, catches in traffic, and bowls a bounce pass to Immanuel Quickley for a triple. It’s missed, so Barnes taps-taps-taps the ball to himself for an I’m-bigger-than-all-of-you offensive rebound.
Meanwhile, Brandon Ingram flows like liquid swords into his jumper. He steps into a 3-pointer, another, curls around a corner triple. He’s counting by higher numbers than the Milwaukee Bucks.














